Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richardson Statue Coming Down


Black

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Well everything I’ve read says it’s temporary...and it’s being MOVED not REMOVED. It doesn’t surprise me JR has a stranglehold to keep this ‘he didn’t want so much’ statue in place. I see no reason to celebrate this BS if it’s just put somewhere else or kept around, it needs to be gone, period.

I really wish we could see the stipulations in the contract, I’m sure there is a legal way around it. Could also be as a serious As Tepper forfeiting the team if he removes it. Who knows.

JR is a racist and sexist but he isn’t stupid. He was never technically ‘forced’ to do anything, and his victims took money instead of legal action and speaking out. Point is, he voluntarily sold the team before things got too involved/hot for him to have no say or authority, which may mean he still has a lot of say of how things go down.

Talk about a poo stain that just won’t wash out. What a POS.

They didn't even tell him they were doing it, which means either it didn't require his permission or they just didn't give a sh-t.

I'd add that "temporary" is an extremely flexible word 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not buying it.

It's an awful lot of trouble to move something that large. To move it back would be just as big a deal.

Plus you'd have to want to.

I don't think Tepper does.

Tepper reportedly removed everything that referenced Jerry Richardson from the inside of the stadium shortly after acquiring the team. It seems pretty clear he didn't care about Richardson's legacy.

Richardson, of course, cares a lot about it, but so what?

I think the whole "public safety" thing is an excuse, and one they can cite for years to come.

(or at least until Richardson isn't around anymore)

Agree. It’s gone for good. They use the word “temporary” to buy some time from answerIng questions and just in case there is really a legal clause about it. Give it a few months most people will have forgotten it was ever there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

When they put it back, it will be rearranged to where the two panthers are feeding on JR

Better yet one of the Panthers is taking a whizz on his face and the other one is pointing and laughing. Kinda like what Jerry did to the mecklenburg county tax payer for so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

Nobody is going to Tepper's reasoning for "safety."  It would have already been moved if that was the reason.

Oh really? How do you know this? Care to make a wager about, Mr. SmartyPants? Put your money where yo mouf is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 4Corners said:

Agree. It’s gone for good. They use the word “temporary” to buy some time from answerIng questions and just in case there is really a legal clause about it. Give it a few months most people will have forgotten it was ever there. 

I used to think the whole conspiracy theory that it wasn't really "contractually obligated" was just tinfoil hat bullsh-t, but given that they were able to do this without even so much as giving Richardson a heads up beforehand makes me really wonder.

Either way, my guess would be that "temporary" extends at least to the day that Richardson shuffles off his creepy mortal coil. After that it just becomes "we'll get around to it... someday."

Heck, even if it is contractually obligated, what happens when they're no longer playing at that stadium site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

newton_david.png&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

David NewtonESPN Staff Writer 

The Panthers are moving the statue of former team owner and founder Jerry Richardson to an undisclosed place. ‘'We were aware of the most recent conversation surrounding the Jerry Richardson statue and are concerned there may be attempts to take it down. We are moving the statue in the interest of public safety,'' a team spokesperson said. There was a clause saying the statue stayed when Richardson, amidst allegations of sexual and racial misconduct, sold the team to David Tepper in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Oh really? How do you know this? Care to make a wager about, Mr. SmartyPants? Put your money where yo mouf is

Yup, I'm 99% sure on my statement, how confident are you on yours?

Once the statue is removed, Tepper can argue if it's returned it endangers the stadium (or something like that).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Nobody is going to Tepper's reasoning for "safety."  It would have already been moved if that was the reason.

I'm pretty sure it's bullsh-t, but I don't care.

Bullsh-t can be an effective tool in the legal system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have just left it there and let people tear it down so they didn't even have to deal with any legal headache later.

No way Jerry had something written in the contract that says if it was destroyed by rioters that they'd have to replace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...