Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers claim 3 players on waivers


vorbis

Recommended Posts

DB Rasul Douglas, 25 years old, 6'2" 209. (Eagles)

DE Shareef Miller, 23 years old, 6'4" 254. (Eagles)

T Trenton Scott, 26 years old, 6'5" 320. (Chargers)

Douglas and Scott both have some starting experience in the league. Shareef Miller played at Penn State with YGM. Scott played for Pat Meyer in San Diego.

So far Matt Kaskey has been released to make room for Trenton Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rasul Douglas was a target many thought the Panthers would go after. Seems like he still has upside despite not fitting with the Eagles. Bet he starts some games this season.

Shareef Miller is a head scratcher. He didn’t fit with the Eagles because he’s more of a 3-4 edge rusher than a 4-3 end. Not sure how he fits on the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still no tight end (except one to the practice squad).

Could be an indication they don't plan to use the tight end as much.  Or that they think that Armah or someone else could be an emergency te.  

Or maybe they just don't think the available talent is that good and they don't want to sign someone for the heck of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is how you do it.  You get players who were not good fits for whatever reason, players with high upside, small contracts.  Burris, Apple, Douglas, Pride, etc.  As much as this disappoints some--if you can develop some of these people--give them a chance---and one or two have lights come on---the investment pays off big time. 

What do we lose?  not much.  But please do not start reading articles from Philly and pretend to know that the player sucks or had parking tickets, etc. Clean slates.  You have to have that attitude.  Some of the crackheads on here are already writing off All-Americans in college that were first round picks.   80% of the time--you are right--congrats. These players were available because people wrote them off--but they were brought here to see if we can turn them around.

How do you think Rhule did it at Temple?  Reading articles from the year before about players and writing them off?  Or did he develop a system that played to their strengths and then motivate them?  That is his MO.  So yes--players signed after cuts or on the cheap are probably not going to make it.  That is basic math.  But if we can get 1-2 per year, that separates the losers from the winners.   Let's see what Rhule and Co. can do without calling players busts before you have ever seen them in Panther black and blue.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, hepcat said:

https://phillysportsnetwork.com/2020/03/22/sul-cb/
 

Good insight on why Douglas was cut. I think it was a good pickup for the Panthers. Cornerback was easily the biggest weakness on the team. TE a close second due to decreased value on the position.

I was reading about him being signed and the writer mentioned that Eli Apple has been dealing with a hamstring issue--I also think the Eagles were hoping to rework the entire CB position--

What people should remember is the system makes a huge difference for CBs. How much pressure to put on them?  (over, under, man--lotta situations that increase or decrease the success probability.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

This is how you do it.  You get players who were not good fits for whatever reason, players with high upside, small contracts.  Burris, Apple, Douglas, Pride, etc.  As much as this disappoints some--if you can develop some of these people--give them a chance---and one or two have lights come on---the investment pays off big time. 

What do we lose?  not much.  But please do not start reading articles from Philly and pretend to know that the player sucks or had parking tickets, etc. Clean slates.  You have to have that attitude.  Some of the crackheads on here are already writing off All-Americans in college that were first round picks.   80% of the time--you are right--congrats. These players were available because people wrote them off--but they were brought here to see if we can turn them around.

How do you think Rhule did it at Temple?  Reading articles from the year before about players and writing them off?  Or did he develop a system that played to their strengths and then motivate them?  That is his MO.  So yes--players signed after cuts or on the cheap are probably not going to make it.  That is basic math.  But if we can get 1-2 per year, that separates the losers from the winners.   Let's see what Rhule and Co. can do without calling players busts before you have ever seen them in Panther black and blue.

 

Makes tons of sense.  You don’t need to hit a home run on these pickups. Need people that can learn the system and create depth on the squad. If 1-2 of these guys can catch on here and contribute the personnel office has done their job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, hepcat said:

https://phillysportsnetwork.com/2020/03/22/sul-cb/
 

Good insight on why Douglas was cut. I think it was a good pickup for the Panthers. Cornerback was easily the biggest weakness on the team. TE a close second due to decreased value on the position.

The former third-round pick did get his chance to start in 2019, starting six games in total. The main complaint with Douglas is that he lacks the speed to keep up with some of the quicker receivers in the league. Playing Press has never really been his forte and when there isn’t safety help over the top or there’s a miscommunication, it reflects poorly on his play.

That is what I mean by the system.  They put him on an island and he needs to play zone--like Bradberry or Norman.  If we had asked Bradberry or Norman to press with no S help----he would have had similar results. 

Norman ran a 4.61 at the combine--Douglas ran a 4.6.  Douglas is 2 inches taller, a bit bigger.  Douglas was a 3rd round pick (based on his speed) and Norman was a 5th rounder (based on speed).  But the fact that Douglas played well in a reserve role and seemed to struggle when asked to do something not aligned with his skill set is important.  If we allow him to play back, face the QB and react instead of playing with his back to the QB running with the WR, he could be great.  Not a slot, but he is suited nicely for the outside.  I like this acquisition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think he did it to spite Bryce. Seems like Bryce is a truly decent guy that virtually everyone likes. I do think Frank likely preferred Stroud and was either was led to believe or deluded himself into thinking that he would have a lot more say in the direction we went at QB in the draft. Once we decided on Bryce knowing Bryce didn't fit his system and preferences in a QB it really seemed like the wind went out of Frank's sails and he basically started mailing it in and just waited to get fired and paid out. Maybe I'm misreading the whole situation but that's certainly the way it looked to me from the outside looking in.
    • Again, it may have nothing to do with Bryce Young. The coaches are thinking about the whole roster. Many guys have said how much different this off-season has been not having to start from square 1 with a playbook, language, etc. You’re talking about bringing in a guy to lead the 2nd team offense who they now have to spend time teaching. Every team is different. This team is young and developing across the board and trying to find some positive continuity. With how Morgan and Canales have approached everything I’m fairly certain they considered all possibilities and decided it was best for the overall team to roll with Dalton for now. They value whatever it is they feel Dalton brings over the extremely low probability of whatever washed out, journey man, reclamation project developing into a franchise QB. You and I have no idea why and aren’t there in the meetings, but it’s clear that the FO sees this young failed franchise QB project as less likely to pan out than you do.
    • Frank justed wanted to throw Young to the wolves because he wanted to draft Stroud. It was a big FU to Tepper and that is why he only lasted a few games before getting canned.
×
×
  • Create New...