Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Weeks Opponent - Chargers


Sean Payton's Vicodin

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, hepcat said:

They will find a way to lose, have faith! This is a team of destiny poised to be the 3rd 0-16 team in history!! 

Having Lawrence will be something to be excited about. But it will suck to lose 24 games in a row to get there.

I'll take 1 or 2 wins and Lawrence. Prefer not to make history as an all time bad team with the Lions and Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Herbert, the guy who everyone was freaking here that we'd draft. 

 

He just came in for Taylor and playing well.  Up on the Chiefs at Half

If Taylor is back though they could put him back in. Out due to injury today, not benched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, t96 said:

If Taylor is back though they could put him back in. Out due to injury today, not benched.

Could.  But if Herbert continues and finishes this game solid and potentially come up with the win.  I doubt you'd turn around and bench him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chargers are hanging with the freaking Chiefs with a ROOKIE QB. Panthers going to get DUSTED out in LA next week. Bridgewater will throw another pair of INTs making me wonder why we signed him yet again. Defense will get shredded by a rookie. And McCaffrey starts to show wear and tear because running backs almost never last more than 2-3 good seasons. 

Good news is that’s one more loss towards getting Trevor Lawrence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

SO WAS DREW BLEDSOE

Bledsoe's injury kept him out for several months. If Taylor is out one game it's not a comparable situation at all. We'll see how Herbert does and of course it has always seemed like it was a matter of time before he started but I wouldn't just assume that Herbert will start next week. Looks likely that he will but certainly not a given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...