Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stop with the tank for Trevor Bull(ish)!


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Just now, FootballMaestro said:

Pretty much. Yup.

He was good. However, some here want to act like he was transformative, which he was not. And I've tried to avoid the Cam comparison (though it was probably undeclared in the back of my mind) to discuss Luck in a vacuum. But you're right. The media overrated Luck, and criminally underrated Cam. And Luck certainly wasn't the talent which they said he was (though good). Far from it.

well, Cam was unjustly scrutinized.  The college scrutiny seems to never leave him.  It was just like, Cam was going be that dude people were always going to hassle.   He was always going to be underrated and downplayed. 

I don't think Luck was overrated though.  I just think he was Andrew Luck.  They largely just called him like he should of been called. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FootballMaestro said:

No. You're the WRONG one comparing him to Peyton Manning, which he was not, never was!!

By that logic, I guess you feel Lawrence will be Peyton Manning, and what Luck was supposed to be as well?

Come on, lay it on the line!

But you know you can't say that. LOL

For All Mankind Space GIF by Apple TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stbugs said:

The Colts were like us. Just think of all the studs they surrounded him with and the OL he had. You’ll realize that it was a front office like ours that didn’t do enough. He was a great pick and he transformed them into a playoff team. How well have the done without him? Are they a playoff team anytime soon? Luck was a very good QB and the Colts made the right choice. Not a single other player in that entire draft would have worked out better.

There are a lot of great QBs that don’t win a SB. We heard all the poo about Cam. Peyton Manning got a lot of grief because he couldn’t win until he finally did. His talent didn’t really change. Sometimes you need a fortunate bounce or a replay official that doesn’t like the other team to actually win.

I hear ya there.

However, I wasn't judging Luck on wins or coaching (though his was better than Cam's IMO). I was judging him on talent; impact and decision making, and it wasn't what they said it was. 

And IIRC, Indy purposefully dismantled that team the previous year for Luck (by jettisoning Peyton for example), thus had a better team than it's record indicated when he was dratted. That helped with his first year record.

Full disclosure: I watched both Luck and Cam's first few seasons. And I feel Cam not only did more with less (particularly the coaching handicap). But I also feel he was the more impressive player. The alleged marksmen type accuracy (as an example) that Luck was supposed to posses was never on display. He was never an Aaron Rogers, Tom Brady; Joe Montana/Steve Young type as they alleged he was. He was more your typical big, rugged competent QB with some drive and skills who made some occasional mistakes in key moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, Cam was unjustly scrutinized.  The college scrutiny seems to never leave him.  It was just like, Cam was going be that dude people were always going to hassle.   He was always going to be underrated and downplayed. 

I don't think Luck was overrated though.  I just think he was Andrew Luck.  They largely just called him like he should of been called. 

Yeah. I definitely liked Luck.

But the overpraise for him, and the nonsense with Cam by idiot media (not the cognoscenti who knew the deal) became so obvious and tiresome. Some of that even filtered into the fan base on boards like this, cause they either couldn't judge things for themselves or find honest media, accounts that countered it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good discussion going on in this thread. I, personally, want Trevor. If Fields or Lance is the pick, I’d be fine with that as well. I just want to get a franchise guy back here, and I believe those guys are elite and will be leading wherever they end up for the next decade plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I don't think the scouts were as in love with Burrow as the fans were. 

The scouts were in love with Trubisky and see how that worked out. Burrow is significantly better than Lawrence and proved it against much better competition. Lawrence got exposed the first time he didn't face an ACC cupcake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People talking about tanking this early are the worst. Team hasn't looked bad at all all things considering. There are certainly some talent decencies on defense, but they've been a scrappy bunch. Lot of the things that have plagued them are fixable, self inflicted stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

The scouts were in love with Trubisky and see how that worked out. Burrow is significantly better than Lawrence and proved it against much better competition. Lawrence got exposed the first time he didn't face an ACC cupcake.

What, during the year they won the championship or last year after he won against Ohio State?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

The scouts were in love with Trubisky and see how that worked out. Burrow is significantly better than Lawrence and proved it against much better competition. Lawrence got exposed the first time he didn't face an ACC cupcake.

You mean like Ohio State and Alabama and Notre Dame?

Do you actually believe this or did you literally only watch one college football game and base every opinion on that one game? It certainly seems like the latter.

He played and beat two secondaries with 3 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks and 1 5th round pick. Cupcakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

What, during the year they won the championship or last year after he won against Ohio State?

Some people are just really bad at analyzing or understanding things. I don’t like Clemson so Lawrence sucks. Lol. Don’t try and tell him that Burrow was 3 years older than Lawrence at the game either or that his WRs and OL were much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...