Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Podcast with Peter King


Samppson

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

After listening ro him, I wonder if Cam just wasn't the right fit for this system. I'm leaning that he was not (mainly due to his accuracy, and possibly decision making). 

I believe Cam thought he was bigger than the team, he is a look at me type player, not saying I dislike Cam, but let's face it Cam was more about himself than being a team. CMC started getting more attention, and Cam views himself the franchise. Also do you remember #1 jersey used to be for the fans. This TEAM doesn't need Superman to save them.

 

Teddy focus is football 

If Cam would've took the time he gave to he's fashion sense to study more, there's no telling how great he could've been. 

 

Not bashing Cam, still the greatest QB in Panthers history, but c'mon he plays for the Patriots. I rather have seen him in a Falcons jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

I believe Cam thought he was bigger than the team, he is a look at me type player, not saying I dislike Cam, but let's face it Cam was more about himself than being a team. CMC started getting more attention, and Cam views himself the franchise. Also do you remember #1 jersey used to be for the fans. This TEAM doesn't need Superman to save them.

This is the furthest thing from the truth.  Cam put winning over everything else since Day 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, top dawg said:

After listening ro him, I wonder if Cam just wasn't the right fit for this system. I'm leaning that he was not (mainly due to his accuracy, and possibly decision making). 

His decisions making was always really good. Cam could read a defense really well. His accuracy was streaky though. Not even bad, just high highs and low lows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ricky Spanish said:

His decisions making was always really good. Cam could read a defense really well. His accuracy was streaky though. Not even bad, just high highs and low lows. 

There were plenty of times when Cam should've thrown the ball out, or checked it down and took what the defense was giving him, but didn't. In that same vein, sometimes extending the play is great, but you must learn to get down before getting hit! He allowed his body to take way more damage than necessary, and I would've liked to have seen him make particularly better decisions in that regard. He made good decisions at times, but he didn't "always" make good decisions. He was inconsistent in his decision making, and sometimes that got him into trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

There were plenty of times when Cam should've thrown the ball out, or checked it down and took what the defense was giving him, but didn't. In that same vein, sometimes extending the play is great, but you must learn to get down before getting hit! He allowed his body to take way more damage than necessary, and I would've liked to have seen him make particularly better decisions in that regard. He made good decisions at times, but he didn't "always" make good decisions. He was inconsistent in his decision making, and sometimes that got him into trouble.

You make some good points but I place blame for this on the coaching. It seems we never really invested in a quality QB coach under the previous regime as we should have - one that would teach Cam the nuances of the position that would’ve helped improve his accuracy, mechanics and decision making. Unfortunately, it’s harder to unlearn bad habits than it is to develop good ones early in one’s career and I’m sure this factored into the decision to part with Cam. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

After listening ro him, I wonder if Cam just wasn't the right fit for this system. I'm leaning that he was not (mainly due to his accuracy, and possibly decision making). 

I said this at the time when we hadn't decided on Cam and before we brought in Bridgewater.  Cam has never been good anticipating receivers and he struggles throwing guys open and throwing to a spot. His accuracy was very hit or miss and he wouldn't do well in a New Orleans style offense.  It doesn't mean Cam isn't a great quarterback simply that you have to put the system that matches his style versus install any system and expect him to adapt to it out of the gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

His decisions making was always really good. Cam could read a defense really well. His accuracy was streaky though. Not even bad, just high highs and low lows. 

Actually his decision-making and reading defenses were areas he did improve tremendously but they have always been weak areas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

You make some good points but I place blame for this on the coaching. It seems we never really invested in a quality QB coach under the previous regime as we should have - one that would teach Cam the nuances of the position that would’ve helped improve his accuracy, mechanics and decision making. Unfortunately, it’s harder to unlearn bad habits than it is to develop good ones early in one’s career and I’m sure this factored into the decision to part with Cam. JMO

Problem is I think Cam wasn't interested in.learning the nuances of the game. He has always over relied on his physical abilities to get him through. Which worked until he got injured 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...