Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Doubted Tepper and Rhule


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Give credit when credit is due. I guess Tepper had the right man in mind to coach this team. We wouldn't have won a game like this with the previous staff. 

He brought the man in and let him pick his coaching staff, his QB and it is working. Good foundation to build further on and with a few more players in the draft and FA.....this team will be solid for seasons to come.

Never expected it. After watching this team sh$t the bed for season after season....tide may finally be turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it crazy to have a position that, after 5 games, the arrow is steadily pointing up but it's also perfectly reasonable to consider the jury still out? And to not feel the need to try to rush to any conclusions at this point and just enjoy things as they are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still early but yes I think Rhule is an excellent hire. We haven’t seen a team play with this level of compose and discipline. Maybe Fox  had it for a few years but then he became lame duck. 
 

Riveras teams were driven way too much by emotion and momentum. Rhule seems to operate with a lot of confidence and intelligence despite disparities in talent.

We just really need to fix the run defense. Aside from that we look really solid. I know we have a lot to be desired defensively but you have to give those guys credit for getting the turnovers to make up for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Is it crazy to have a position that, after 5 games, the arrow is steadily pointing up but it's also perfectly reasonable to consider the jury still out? And to not feel the need to try to rush to any conclusions at this point and just enjoy things as they are?

Exactly this. The full 16 game season will tell the story. Especially in terms of Bridgewater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Is this really reality to give Marty no credit for this at all??

Is it really that hard or is it this much hate not to see anyway Hurney did a good job??

Geez, you related? Tell us what Marty did differently this year from the past two years of awfulness that wasn’t directly related to Rhule and Co. I saw someone try to give him credit for Anderson LOL when Anderson espoused at how much love he felt for Rhule.

Marty’s mediocre and sorry, but I give 99% of the credit for this team to Rhule, Brady and the rest of the coaching staff. This team is playing well above the talent level we started the season with and that’s coaching. I 100% want a better GM because in 2 years our coaches knowledge of the college players will be the same as every other staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not sold on Snow I don't know what his obsession is with the 3 man rush. It doesn't work ya even if you are trying to cover your back end, the only way they didn't connect on the 3 man rush was when the WR dropped the ball. It really didn't help the run game either, massive gaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Is it crazy to have a position that, after 5 games, the arrow is steadily pointing up but it's also perfectly reasonable to consider the jury still out? And to not feel the need to try to rush to any conclusions at this point and just enjoy things as they are?

Agreed. If LA loses to the Saints, the teams we lost to are 6-4 and the teams we beat will be 4-11. That said, I give a ton of credit to coaching. Our secondary and LBers and OL still have a lot of holes. Scheme (hey Ron and Mike, I’m talking about you) can hide deficiencies and we are doing that really well. If we were to play Baltimore, KC (have been a little suspect, almost lost to LAC as well, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, GB or Seattle, we wouldn’t win because we still have those holes. I think we might be one more good draft away although we could lose almost our entire OL to FA.

It’s early and while we played better than I thought we would at this point, we haven’t beat a good team yet. Arizona is 3-2 but beat the Jets 0-5, Washington 1-4 (beat 1 win Philly) and SF 2-2 losing 24-7 to Miami right now.

Again, I think the coaching job has been phenomenal and we are way better than I thought we’d be and we just have 3-4 spots on D and the IOL (if we can resign Ts) to be a real contender. Luckily, Brady and Brees are almost done and Matty sucks. As long as Atlanta doesn’t get Lawrence and a competent coach we aren’t far from owning the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...