Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Two games without a sack - Okung: Who would want to hit that guy?


mav1234

Recommended Posts

Hats off to the Panthers OL at keeping Teddy largely clean the last two weeks, allowing no sacks.  According to David Newton over at ESPN, Russel Okung had this to say about the OL's work keeping Teddy off the ground: "He's such a great person, who would want to hit that guy?''  Love it!

Also some credit where credit is due - scheme & quick release have helped mask some weaknesses on the OL.  But great work by the big guys at opening huge holes for our RBs, as well!  OL has been a much-improved area this season after years and years of it being a huge weakness for the team.

edit: pantherj believes the quote was wrongly reported from Newton and was "who would want to get that guy hit?", which would make more sense.  regardless, great job by the OL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

With the way he's played, would be nice to get Okung for another year before he hangs it up.  Need to extend Moton first, and then offer Okung some Bitcoin. 

Okung was a great pickup.  I was pretty skeptical of him, to be honest, but I also had basically given up hope of having a decent OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PhillyB said:

his run blocking has been fuging fantastic too. i loves seeing him pick up toddering mike davis early in the game and setting him down past a couple tacklers to churn out another chunk of yards.

I hope someone makes a gif of that play. It was amazing, hahaha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Okung was a great pickup.  I was pretty skeptical of him, to be honest, but I also had basically given up hope of having a decent OL.

My question with Okung is still how long he can keep it up.

No question he's good when healthy (infinitely Superior to Greg Little) but I seriously doubt he's a long-term solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, pantherj said:

What he exactly said was "who would want to get that guy hit?" He was talking very fast.

Updated the OP.  That would make more sense, lol

It is funny how everyone talks about how much the team loves Teddy.  Never really heard a player talked about quite like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy's communication with the offensive line pre-snap is a huge reason why our pass pro is so good. If you noticed that we get out of the huddle with about 15 seconds left and let Teddy maneuver the pass pro and identify any blitzers. This coupled with Brady's playcalling has allowed Teddy to stay off the ground the past eight quarters.

 

This isn't to take anything away from our offensive line. They busted Atlanta's ass today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...