Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

big players make big plays in big games


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Really? Remove two big playmakers from any offense in the league. Chances are they look pretty fragile. 

If Davis wasn't gassed/injured that would have helped a poo ton. We were basically one dimensional for a whole half.

Teddy did excellent given the situation, except for the last play which was a horrible read on his part. 

If we had a steady back on that last 4th down, it would have been an easy first. We just gotta learn to finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rags said:

I have been one of DJs most vocal supporters here. So yeah on that play I wouldn't blame DJ or Robby. Robby was struggling against fuller and couldn't consistently get separation against him and he deserves critisims too. 

However one WR had 3 drops while the other had one. 

He in no way, shape or form had 3 drops. You’re calling every incompletion a drop. If it takes a superhuman effort to touch the ball, it’s not a drop. Or, look at it this way: if Robby did that, would you call it a drop? No, you’d say it was a bad throw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

He in no way, shape or form had 3 drops. You’re calling every incompletion a drop. If it takes a superhuman effort to touch the ball, it’s not a drop. Or, look at it this way: if Robby did that, would you call it a drop? No, you’d say it was a bad throw. 

DJ had 2 critical drops outside the 4th and 2 play that I remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

He in no way, shape or form had 3 drops. You’re calling every incompletion a drop. If it takes a superhuman effort to touch the ball, it’s not a drop. Or, look at it this way: if Robby did that, would you call it a drop? No, you’d say it was a bad throw. 

They are counting the plays where he was sexually harassed in the end zone, the one where he got a pass interference call setting up a TD and then the one he was so wide open Teddy poo a brick and threw a terrible pass his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

That play looked like a broken route or a misthrow - maybe Teddy was rushed. I'll have to catch the replay.

I place the blame on Teddy since he ultimately was throwing the ball, but the way Moore was contorting his body, I wondered if he was running the wrong route.

Maybe that explains a lot of teddy’s throws this year. Lack of off season. It happens a lot, teddy throws behind or wrong side and wr’s have to contort to make the catch. I see that a few times a game. Conversely, maybe teddy just isn’t accurate. Which is supported by poor placement on passes not described above. Though admittedly the two games prior to this one that was getting a lot better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

In baseball, if a ball is bouncing wildly to the shortstop and he can’t get ahold of it in time to make a throw, it is not considered an error. I apply the same logic to a wide receiver. 

That's why I said excluding the 4th and 2.  The endzone throw was perfect. He dropped another great ball too, though I'd have to look at the play by play to pull it out for you.

None the less, DJ made some great plays when he needed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Varking said:

Teddy wasn’t about to get killed. DJ was wide open. Teddy could have and should have thrown a much better ball than that. It’s still early in the season and he could still ball out but this wasn’t a good Teddy game. And he sealed the game with the next INT on a ball he had no business throwing. 

true cat GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

Maybe that explains a lot of teddy’s throws this year. Lack of off season. It happens a lot, teddy throws behind or wrong side and wr’s have to contort to make the catch. I see that a few times a game. Conversely, maybe teddy just isn’t accurate. Which is supported by poor placement on passes not described above. Though admittedly the two games prior to this one that was getting a lot better. 

Teddy is clearly throwing to places on the field more often than not.  That is why I think it is perhaps a route issue on that throw.  Yes, he has bad throws occasionally, and that may have been one.  But I'd like to see that replay because usually his bad throws are *deep*, and that was not a deep pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

There were very fine people on both sides of the 4th down. DJ could have nabbed it but Teddy made a poor throw.

Absolutely no excuse for the final INT though. That was awful. Probably learned that from Brees.

DJ had it in his pouch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...