Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule is PISSED


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Was just watching his presser and he is hot.  Face is red and he has repeatedly lamented just in the first 2 minutes that the decision to take the FG attempt was less than ideal.  And he's not holding any punches...

It's weird, bc as hard as I've been on Teddy, from my point of view, despite the long-standing rule that you CANNOT take a sack when in FG range, I felt like the way they sent the pressure it was virtually impossible not to lose yards there, either via sack or intentional grounding.  So, I finally felt like that issue wasn't on Teddy, but Rhule is insinuating it is.  They asked him if he felt Teddy could've gotten rid of it on 3rd down, and he said, "You can't take a sack there.  I don't care who it is on - the offensive line, the running back, the receivers, Teddy...  you just can't take a sack there.  Teddy can't take a sack there."

Yikes.

I felt Teddy played one of his best games today, but honestly, both he and Brady appear to be having some consistent issues late in games.

And while I'm here, I have to disagree with Jeremy's assertion that we got outcoached today.  Against a team and staff who have absolutely demolished and embarrassed Ron and Co. the last few years, and the team and staff I consider the cream of the crop of our division despite all Tampa has done, we pushed them to the very edge...  Had the officials not spotted them points and multiple new sets of downs on 3rd down situations, and if the defense could have done ANYTHING in the first half, that game is won easily.  I HATE moral victories, and although I'm disappointed we lost, I am inexplicably upbeat after this game.  Despite the struggles, I am incredibly encouraged by the adjustments we see made every week following the half.  This staff is special...  they are just different from anything we've had before.  We just got beat by a better overall team today.  We need defensive help badly.  The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how that sack is on Teddy.  We've all seen our QBs thru the years dancing around and run backwards and take a huge sack when we can't afford to, but the pressure came off the side instantly and when he tried to step up Davis lost his block (hard to ask a RB to block a DL, anyway), and that is when the play ended.  I'll need to see a replay of it... perhaps he had more time than it seemed.

We've all seen playcalls where the ball is out immediately after the snap.  Surprised that wasn't the call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

He’s not wrong and it’s true the offense has played like a bunch of assholes with the game on the line in the 4th quarter 

I agree.  So far, that is the biggest issue offensively...  game winning/tying drives are a problem both for Brady and Teddy and Co.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Was just watching his presser and he is hot.  Face is red and he has repeatedly lamented just in the first 2 minutes that the decision to take the FG attempt was less than ideal.  And he's not holding any punches...

It's weird, bc as hard as I've been on Teddy, from my point of view, despite the long-standing rule that you CANNOT take a sack when in FG range, I felt like the way they sent the pressure it was virtually impossible not to lose yards there, either via sack or intentional grounding.  So, I finally felt like that issue wasn't on Teddy, but Rhule is insinuating it is.  They asked him if he felt Teddy could've gotten rid of it on 3rd down, and he said, "You can't take a sack there.  I don't care who it is on - the offensive line, the running back, the receivers, Teddy...  you just can't take a sack there.  Teddy can't take a sack there."

Yikes.

I felt Teddy played one of his best games today, but honestly, both he and Brady appear to be having some consistent issues late in games.

And while I'm here, I have to disagree with Jeremy's assertion that we got outcoached today.  Against a team and staff who have absolutely demolished and embarrassed Ron and Co. the last few years, and the team and staff I consider the cream of the crop of our division despite all Tampa has done, we pushed them to the very edge...  Had the officials not spotted them points and multiple new sets of downs on 3rd down situations, and if the defense could have done ANYTHING in the first half, that game is won easily.  I HATE moral victories, and although I'm disappointed we lost, I am inexplicably upbeat after this game.  Despite the struggles, I am incredibly encouraged by the adjustments we see made every week following the half.  This staff is special...  they are just different from anything we've had before.  We just got beat by a better overall team today.  We need help defensive help badly.  The end.

His golden boy OC should never, ever have called that screen.  One, Davis is too slow for that. Two Davis has been nicked  up 

and THREE.  ALWAYS PUT THE HANDS IN YOUR PLAYMAKER’s HANDS FOR THE LAST DRIVE AND THAt  IS NOT MIKE

that stupid screen sealed it   
period 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I don't see how that sack is on Teddy.  We've all seen our QBs thru the years dancing around and run backwards and take a huge sack when we can't afford to, but the pressure came off the side instantly and when he tried to step up Davis lost his block (hard to ask a RB to block a DL, anyway), and that is when the play ended.  I'll need to see a replay of it... perhaps he had more time than it seemed.

We've all seen playcalls where the ball is out immediately after the snap.  Surprised that wasn't the call.

Watching it live, it appeared they got instant pressure up the middle and sent extra guys hard off each edge.

If you know they're bringing pressure, which they typically always have in those situations, you gotta have a hot read or a quick outlet setup.  With them sending extra guys, you got to scheme someone open quick...  it looked to me, like Brady called something long-developing, the blocking failed, and that's why Teddy had nowhere to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Watching it live, it appeared they got instant pressure up the middle and sent extra guys hard off each edge.

If you know they're bringing pressure, which they typically always have in those situations, you gotta have a hot read or a quick outlet setup.  With them sending extra guys, you got to scheme someone open quick...  it looked to me, like Brady called something long-developing, the blocking failed, and that's why Teddy had nowhere to go.

That is how I felt live, but I haven't seen a replay. I want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...