Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I finally got a job


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

My previous job was a covid cut.  It took 6 months for me to find a job that might come close to replacing what I lost.   Good news is that I will be working remotely, and am looking forward to that. Also has good benefits.  The position is a base plus commission so no guarantees but I believe I can be successful. My 2nd interview was my 1st Zoom experience.

I know I am lucky...there are a lot of people who cannot find a decent job these days.  But damn...I would never have thought that I would ever be unemployed for 6 months.  It is a tough new world. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2020 at 10:14 AM, ladypanther said:

My previous job was a covid cut.  It took 6 months for me to find a job that might come close to replacing what I lost.   Good news is that I will be working remotely, and am looking forward to that. Also has good benefits.  The position is a base plus commission so no guarantees but I believe I can be successful. My 2nd interview was my 1st Zoom experience.

I know I am lucky...there are a lot of people who cannot find a decent job these days.  But damn...I would never have thought that I would ever be unemployed for 6 months.  It is a tough new world. 

 

Congrats on finding a new job. I'm in the construction world and out here in the PNW competitive wages are running $30 an hour with as much OT as you can take. Depending on the industry I imagine it can be but others are growing exponentially. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was taught at a very young age to never burn bridges, always give two week etc. I really think that has been lost on the up and coming generation (and I’m not that old).

Congrats on the job, any job is good in this age, thankful everyday I have steady employment and while it did take hard work, that was merely a looked at as a given, make no mistake about it - luck has a lot more to do with it than people (especially older people) lead you to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a six month layoff experience myself back in the 90s. I became a stay at home dad, growing more despondent every week that I was rejected for being over or under qualified for every job I applied for. Ended up getting basically a dream job, and now look back on the six months I spent with my 3 year old daughter as some of the best times of my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2020 at 8:45 PM, cookinwithgas said:

I had a six month layoff experience myself back in the 90s. I became a stay at home dad, growing more despondent every week that I was rejected for being over or under qualified for every job I applied for. Ended up getting basically a dream job, and now look back on the six months I spent with my 3 year old daughter as some of the best times of my life.

I had a similar experience, but the details of my situation and job search were different.  In the end the time I spent with my daughter from February to October will always be one of the most satisfying times of my life.  She was slightly younger than yours was, mine turned 2 that October so it started when she was like 1-1/2.  

One simple thing that brought joy to my heart then and when I look back on it now is our daily walks.  I would take her on an hour long walk in her stroller each day around the neighborhood.  Eventually this led to walking her around the backyard in her toy car in the backyard, and by the end she was able to take short walks around the neighborhood by my side.  I was able to capture on video the first time she noticed her shadow on the sidewalk in front of our house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2020 at 4:36 PM, onmyown said:

I was taught at a very young age to never burn bridges, always give two week etc. I really think that has been lost on the up and coming generation (and I’m not that old).

 

How many times has a company ever given an employee a two week notice before cutting them loose? Yeah...

When I was a kid, it was commonplace for people to work decades for the same company. These days, you're an old head with most companies if you've been there 5+ years. There are so many layoffs, "restructures", etc. There's no reason to show any loyalty to most companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How many times has a company ever given an employee a two week notice before cutting them loose? Yeah...

When I was a kid, it was commonplace for people to work decades for the same company. These days, you're an old head with most companies if you've been there 5+ years. There are so many layoffs, "restructures", etc. There's no reason to show any loyalty to most companies.

Just because a large company does it does not mean it’s the same for you. It’s not showing loyalty to a company. It’s showing who you are as a person, character, and dignity. It’s not about the company it’s about yourself as a person and employee. It’s not a fail proof plan some companies may not care, but other may remember that and it could be a factor.
 

The point was not to burn bridges and that concept spreads further than a single company. Employees will notice who may go on to something better or different and can vouch for you and want you to join them. It plays a part in networking. I’ve personally experienced it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Just because a large company does it does not mean it’s the same for you. It’s not showing loyalty to a company. It’s showing who you are as a person, character, and dignity. It’s not about the company it’s about yourself as a person and employee. It’s not a fail proof plan some companies may not care, but other may remember that and it could be a factor.
 

The point was not to burn bridges and that concept spreads further than a single company. Employees will notice who may go on to something better or different and can vouch for you and want you to join them. It plays a part in networking. I’ve personally experienced it.

Companies should expect to be treated by their employees the way they treat their employees. I'm loyal to people, not companies. I have a great relationship with all but one of my former bosses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...