Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Enough to make a person cry. Alternatives to drafting Little


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Objectively speaking, Ridley is probably better.

But that really only hurts us if Moore is bad. He isn't (far from it).

I'll keep Moore. He's having a good season even though he and the QB clearly aren't on the same page. Ridley has benefitted from the much better situation for a WR and it's still close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Factoring in also that we would have taken him at Pick #16 if Brian Burns hadn't fallen.

I’ve said it before but we should send Christmas cards to Ferrell, Daniel Jones, Hockensin, Haskins and Lindstrom. I have no idea what they did to get their teams to consider them over Burns, but thank his they did. If we took Little instead of getting Burns, ooh wee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jerrya said:

Hindsight is easy.

It’s not hindsight. Have you been in any of the predraft threads? There was a ton of discussion in here. People loved Burns predraft and our biggest worry was actually thinking there’s no way he’d last till 16. Little was universally panned and we preferred Taylor, Risner, McCoy (my favorite and now a top 25 under 25 for NO) and Jenkins. We all thought that T was a bit weaker in 2019 and that 2020 was the year to get a bookend for Moton. You can call it hindsight or just plain bad picks like Gaulden who everyone disliked as soon as the pick was made. Sometimes our GM just plain sucks, it’s not hindsight. As posted earlier, there appear to be plenty of moves universally panned by the folks who love the draft and we, unfortunately, seem to be far more right than Hurney was, at least pre-Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s not hindsight. Have you been in any of the predraft threads? There was a ton of discussion in here. People loved Burns predraft and our biggest worry was actually thinking there’s no way he’d last till 16. Little was universally panned and we preferred Taylor, Risner, McCoy (my favorite and now a top 25 under 25 for NO) and Jenkins. We all thought that T was a bit weaker in 2019 and that 2020 was the year to get a bookend for Moton. You can call it hindsight or just plain bad picks like Gaulden who everyone disliked as soon as the pick was made. Sometimes our GM just plain sucks, it’s not hindsight. As posted earlier, there appear to be plenty of moves universally panned by the folks who love the draft and we, unfortunately, seem to be far more right than Hurney was, at least pre-Rhule.

 And we both can go back to Gettleman drafts and show the same thing. I can vouch for you wanting Kittle. And I’m sure you remember me losing it when we traded up for Dashon Hall with picks that could have been Eddie Jackson and Carl Lawson. This isn’t just a Hurney thing. The draft isn’t that hard if you pay attention. Just like the salary cap doesn’t take an Ivy Leaguer to understand. Edit: And let’s not forget about Crosby and Omenihu. 

    I got called anti-SEC because I said Little was a mistake....lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 And we both can go back to Gettleman drafts and show the same thing. I can vouch for you wanting Kittle. And I’m sure you remember me losing it when we traded up for Dashon Hall with picks that could have been Eddie Jackson and Carl Lawson. This isn’t just a Hurney thing. The draft isn’t that hard if you pay attention. Just like the salary cap doesn’t take an Ivy Leaguer to understand. 

    I got called anti-SEC because I said Little was a mistake....lol

Very true. At least with Hall, it was just 1 pick in between CMC, Samuel, Moton, Elder, Armah and Butker. Little was after Burns but then part of Grier, Miller, Scarlett, Daley and Godwin. Sucks having a 1 player draft where nobody in here liked anyone outside of Burns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hurney actually said at the time of the draft that the first three picks were need picks. Everybody after Will Grier was BPA.

Well I guess that shows you how that works out. Both Grier and Little have been huge busts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

What do we consider the 2019 draft then? 

Christian Miller and Daley have shown enough flashes to have a place in this league. That’s enough to make it 1000x better than 2016.

Bradberry was the only player worth a damn and it took Vernon to get a 2nd contract to actually start playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Christian Miller and Daley have shown enough flashes to have a place in this league. That’s enough to make it 1000x better than 2016.

Bradberry was the only player worth a damn and it took Vernon to get a 2nd contract to actually start playing.

   If those two showed “flashes” then Worley and Butler sure did to. If it wasn’t for injuries would Daley have ever even played much at all. And what has Miller shown? It’s every bit as bad as 2016 if not worse. Little is already done. Grier was a waste. Scarlett is gone. What has Daley done this year? And Miller is at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...