Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 10 QBs ranked nov 19 by PFF


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

This...scares me.

The knock on Lance is fairly simple: accuracy. Since the start of 2019, he’s had the lowest percentage of his passing attempts deemed accurate of any quarterback in this top 10 (47.1%). In his defense, his 11.5-yard average depth of target is the second deepest of anyone on this list. Those accuracy issues, however, keep us from completely buying in on him as a sure-fire franchise quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawrence would run Brady's system here perfectly. Literally perfectly. Like Mahomes in KC. I would 100% be all for selling the farm to get him if he won't play for the Jets. He is just so far ahead of every other QB in this class as a prospect and there are 3 other QBs who are worthy of a top 5 pick... If the opportunity is there because he snubs the Jets we need to be in on that. I doubt that happens and he most certainly just becomes a Jet but a man can dream right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

I understand the concern, but wasn't this also the chief issue with Josh Allen of the Bills when he was coming out?

Josh Allen did a ton of work this past off season to fix his issues. The Bills got pretty lucky. Few QBs can fix their mechanics this late in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I understand the concern, but wasn't this also the chief issue with Josh Allen of the Bills when he was coming out?

Yes it was. And his development has been extremely impressive, but it should be noted that Allen is a rare outlier in that regard. Most QBs who come out of college with accuracy issues don't ever get them fixed. I don't actually think it's that big of an issue with Lance and I'm a big fan of his (would 100% take him if the top 2 and Wilson were gone, though I think I prefer Wilson to him at this point), but I will say I think Lance is the most likely to bust of the top 4. All 4 are great, great prospects though and you can't go wrong with taking a shot on any of them high in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

This...scares me.

 

 

This was a bit surprising. First time I’ve heard of this. I’ve always read he is very accurate. Here’s from Jeremiah: “

  1. Accuracy: I say this all the time: Do not get caught up in completion percentage when evaluating accuracy. Lance completed nearly 67 percent of his passes, which is impressive, but the tape showed he was even more accurate than that number indicates. His ball placement is excellent. He really trusts his eyes and throws with anticipation, which allows his receivers better opportunities to run after the catch. He can layer the ball in the middle of the field (over linebackers and under safeties) and he excels on bucket throws (deep balls over the top).”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...