Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones


saX man

The QB Poll: Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Let's say we have the choice of any of these guys...who's your pick? Give your reasons/team fit/scheme fit/dry your beans

    • Justin Fields, Ohio State, 6'3 228
      71
    • Zach Wilson, BYU, 6'3 210
      62
    • Trey Lance, NDSU, 6'4 226
      46
    • Kyle Trask, Florida, 6'5 240
      10
    • Mac Jones, Bama, 6'3 214
      8


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, t96 said:

Do you think it's fair to say Trask/Jones are pretty much unanimously in a tier below the other 3? Or could you see reasons with them that a team would rank either higher than any of your top 3?

Most definitely not in the same tier. I cannot overstate how much of an issue Trask's lack of mobility is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Most definitely not in the same tier. I cannot overstate how much of an issue Trask's lack of mobility is. 

Yeah that's what I figured, completely agree. Maybe old Bill in NE takes him, he's so used to having an immobile QB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RockyTopVol said:

Which part? It's a fact that he's slightly faster. 

As for the comparison, Lance is being compared to Watson by a lot of scouts. I've even seen Andrew Luck...but I don't like that one as much. 

How is it a fact he is faster? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson has looked fantastic this year. The Coastal game isn’t too concerning considering they scheduled it with 2 days of preparation and his receivers really didn’t help him that game. Lance looked okay his one game against central Arkansas. Fields looked overwhelmed against northwestern. We’ll see how he looks against Clemson. Trask has played above average against way better opponents 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, signing up for FanDuel Network, and then canceling FanDuel Network:
    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
×
×
  • Create New...