Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Two things in our favor, draft-wise


PanthersATL

Recommended Posts

a) Rhule knows how to evaluate college players and figure out how to make them succeed on the field. Sure, it might take one season to get them rolling with The Process, but Rhule has proven he can take a ragtag gang of misfits and turn them into contenders in a short timeframe.

b) Luke is also scouting players. And Luke knows how to watch tape.

Who wouldn't want to be a fly on the wall listening to the Rhule + Luke analysis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I appreciate your optimism - does Rhule actually have any track record of that at the NFL level? His success came from getting players at 2nd or 3rd tier CFB programs to buy into a system. And while he was very successful at that an I hope he replicates that here.....this is a whole new animal to him 
 

and we all love Luke - but being a generational player doesn’t necessarily translate to scouting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, J.B. said:

As much as I appreciate your optimism - does Rhule actually have any track record of that at the NFL level? His success came from getting players at 2nd or 3rd tier CFB programs to buy into a system. And while he was very successful at that an I hope he replicates that here.....this is a whole new animal to him 
 

and we all love Luke - but being a generational player doesn’t necessarily translate to scouting 

If you believe that Rhule was in charge of the last draft, which most of us believe, he has started off well.

Luke is probably one of the best to ever play and his ability to watch tape and adjust his game to what he watches.  That said, watching potential players on tape.  He would be able to determine whether it was talent or scheme that made the player good.    

I think his input would be invaluable.  Maybe not making  the final decision but giving a players point of view would definitely help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Based on this year's success, I'm optimistic about our draft future. The Seahawks had a string of tremendous drafts following hiring Pete Carroll that kick-started their success. These college coaches know college talent. They likely recruited a lot of these guys.

Pete had an extra advantage because he was basically an NFL coach who was spending time at the college level.  He had a good idea of what traits translated to the NFL, and who had them.  He definitely had an advantage in scouting players, having been in some of their living rooms meeting their family and watching them grow.  His buddy Pat Kirwan told the story of getting a phone call from Pete Carrol when Pete was still at USC.  He told Pat "keep an eye on the Earl Thomas kid I just lost to Texas.  I think he's the next Troy Polamalu!"  Years later everyone remembers when he had a chance to take his own USC safety but took Earl instead.

42 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Luke is also scouting players. And Luke knows how to watch tape.

Wow, if we are still using tape that's something Tepper is going to have to upgrade to some kind of digital format. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

If you believe that Rhule was in charge of the last draft, which most of us believe, he has started off well.

Luke is probably one of the best to ever play and his ability to watch tape and adjust his game to what he watches.  That said, watching potential players on tape.  He would be able to determine whether it was talent or scheme that made the player good.    

I think his input would be invaluable.  Maybe not making  the final decision but giving a players point of view would definitely help. 

I don’t believe for a second that Rhule was in charge of the last draft. That’s why Hurney was kept around 

I don’t see a world where a billionaire hires a coach with zero NFL experience and just let’s him run everything himself

Surely he had impact - but not his show alone (yet)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, J.B. said:

I don’t believe for a second that Rhule was in charge of the last draft. That’s why Hurney was kept around 

I don’t see a world where a billionaire hires a coach with zero NFL experience and just let’s him run everything himself

Surely he had impact - but not his show alone (yet)

Do you believe it now? Marty sure wouldn’t have been fired if he was in charge of a great draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Based on this year's success, I'm optimistic about our draft future. The Seahawks had a string of tremendous drafts following hiring Pete Carroll that kick-started their success. These college coaches know college talent. They likely recruited a lot of these guys.

Me too. It’s also why I wanted Marty gone. Can I get a hallelujah? Rhule and co are soon not going to have that knowledge advantage that helped so much especially since many visits and pro days got canceled. Having a competent GM/scouts installed that can weigh in and take over a bit as Rhule and co will have way less extra knowledge starting in the 2022/2023 drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...