Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Donte Jackson close to being elite?


Varking

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Varking said:

Well his number one priority is covering people. If our dline and linebackers do their job we shouldn’t be asking him to make tons of tackles on running back. 

That would be fantastic if teams would stop running ISO’s to him directly, why do they do that? Oh yeah because he does not attack the ball carrier. He is doing a good job in coverage but he has to hold his own in the run game. Right now he is a liability in the run game. I agree we need line backers to keep gap integrity, but when teams audible to you intentionally you have to make the play, otherwise you only need to see the field on obvious passing situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, philit99 said:

That would be fantastic if teams would stop running ISO’s to him directly, why do they do that? Oh yeah because he does not attack the ball carrier. He is doing a good job in coverage but he has to hold his own in the run game. Right now he is a liability in the run game. I agree we need line backers to keep gap integrity, but when teams audible to you intentionally you have to make the play, otherwise you only need to see the field on obvious passing situations.

Ever wonder why they don’t run at him every play? Because the dline and linebackers can stop that if they do their job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think he's running out of "learning" time. If he's coming into practice and meetings with the right attitude I hope the staff basically treats this as a medical redshirt year. If he hasn't, he should potentially be on the chopping block

 

If he was still having those issues he would be cut already. Rhule has no loyalty to him because he wasn’t here when we drafted him. I haven’t heard or read about any issues from him lately and no news is good news. Seems to be doing the right things and playing well. Imagine if we kept Bradberry...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

If he was still having those issues he would be cut already. Rhule has no loyalty to him because he wasn’t here when we drafted him. I haven’t heard or read about any issues from him lately and no news is good news. Seems to be doing the right things and playing well. Imagine if we kept Bradberry...

Hurney just recently got fired.

I hope DJax is coachable because he has some talent to work with. I'm not ready to give up on him just yet, I would just understand it if there's behind the scenes reasons that the staff is ready to give up in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm super optimistic that it looks like the current coaching staff has a plan and a "type" (great athletes who they can coach up) and you can look no further than the last draft class' contributions early on and the fact that the two most frustrating players on the roster, Curtis and DJack, have shown marked improvement this year. We'd probably appreciate it more if the team had more talent and wins tbh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also vividly remember Chris Gamble being hated on this board and never catching a criticism break bc of a bad special teams play in Minnesota but eventually he turned into a good player. He was legit his last few years here, late bloomer type which makes sense since he was learning to play CB on the fly in the NFL. 

Thomas Davis wasn't good until his tore his knee up a few times and we switched to the Tampa 2 (then he suddenly was better than Beason). I'm willing to be patient with certain guys (reason I haven't mentioned Greg Little).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, philit99 said:

That would be fantastic if teams would stop running ISO’s to him directly, why do they do that? Oh yeah because he does not attack the ball carrier. He is doing a good job in coverage but he has to hold his own in the run game. Right now he is a liability in the run game. I agree we need line backers to keep gap integrity, but when teams audible to you intentionally you have to make the play, otherwise you only need to see the field on obvious passing situations.

Man you're picking a weird hill to die on. There's not a lot of 5'10 corners who are going to attack the run and before you say "what about this guy" know they're the exception, not the rule. Running isos towards DBs is something....that's a common gameplan.

But that said, Donte has still put played with physicality against the run a few times this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rags said:

Man you're picking a weird hill to die on. There's not a lot of 5'10 corners who are going to attack the run and before you say "what about this guy" know they're the exception, not the run. Running isos towards DBs is something....that's a common gameplan.

But that said, Donte has still put played with physicality against the run a few times this season.

In all honesty, his tackling and physicality in the running game is VERY hit or miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donte Jackson has made improvements as the season progressed. I hope he continues to improve in both the passing and run game. I hate CB’s having to make plays in stopping the run, but it is a fact of life in the NFL. I watched a ton of tape earlier this year where Donte avoided making any contact on a RB. He has looked much better in the last 3 games or so. Unfortunately, if you are a defender it is your job is to stop the ball carrier. You can’t be elite if you are only judging half his game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...