Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another GM Interview

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Probably means no Peters as well.

I wouldn't assume that.

Breer and Rapoport had named Fitterer as someone that we were interested in before the process ever started but his name never showed up on the interview list...till now.

Guessing he wasn't able (or wasn't willing) to interview till after Seattle was out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I was just watching First Take and they were discussing how Seattle hasn't hit on their first round picks.  

It's has me worried that they are not happy with any of the 400 interviews we've already conducted. 

I agree that they must not love any of the candidates interviewed so far. 
 

I briefly started to look at the Seahawks draft history and they haven’t drafted earlier than 27 in the last 8 drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I was just watching First Take and they were discussing how Seattle hasn't hit on their first round picks.  

It's has me worried that they are not happy with any of the 400 interviews we've already conducted. 

One thing I find a little odd...

For the last several years, Fitterer has worked alongside Trent Kirchner. Kirchner has Panther connections. He worked here for a while in the scouting department before moving on to Seattle. pretty much every time we've had a job opening, Kirchner has been connected to it.

But we're interviewing Fitterer and not Kirchner. Haven't seen any indication that we're set to interview Ryan Cowden either.

Connections to the old regime don't seem to mean much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FakePlasticTrees Enthusiast

FakePlasticTrees

Posted
Posted

It is in many ways the exact opposite of our coach search. It does lead me to believe that no candidate has really "hit a homerun" in their interview like Rhule did. Alternatively, it does take to "two to tango" and perhaps the hesitancy is from the candidate rather than the team.

I think I would rather have a little too much information than too little information and more options rather than less options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...