Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of Dan Morgan and Fitterer...


blueandblackattack
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hadn't thought about that.

Morgan and Kuechly in the same front office? That's intriguing.

Right? It's like if the Spiderverse was the Pantherverse!

Spider-Man Movie GIF by Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse

 

I hadn't considered it either because I thought Directors and Assistant GM's were kinda along the same level, so it wouldn't be a bump up for him. But if it does, then come on down!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, blueandblackattack said:

Right? It's like if the Spiderverse was the Pantherverse!

I hadn't considered it either because I thought Directors and Assistant GM's were kinda along the same level, so it wouldn't be a bump up for him. But if it does, then come on down!

Assistant GM would be a promotion for Morgan.

Teams were able to refuse us permission to interview guys last year because we weren't offering a position that included roster control.

The NFL changed some of those rules for this year because the Patriots kept screwing guys like Nick Caserio and Monti Ossenfort out of better opportunities, but I don't know if those changes would affect this sort of thing or not.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah injuries aside Morgan, Beason, and Kuechly were all HOF talents.

We were spoiled with such great HOF level MLB play from 2001-2019. 
Incredible to have drafted these guys. 
Seefart was a terrible Panthers coach but he left us Dan Morgan, Kris Jenkins and #89. Arguably 2 HOF talents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...