Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of Dan Morgan and Fitterer...


blueandblackattack
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ship said:

With Chinn aiming for DROTY I’d say pretty good

What does Luke have to do with Chinn? Luke is a pro scout for us, he's essentially just watching film of our opponents to try to pick things/tendencies up to help us gameplan for them... Sure he kind of mentored him at times and gave him some tips but I wouldn't read a ton into that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

So we won't have our assistant GM that Tepper wants, or any of the new scouts before the draft? Why wouldn't we?

Time frame and contracts.

Scouts and personnel people are going to be busy pretty soon. It's easier to just go with the people we have for now.

That, plus these days a lot of front office and scouting people's contracts expire around draft time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

So we won't have our assistant GM that Tepper wants, or any of the new scouts before the draft? Why wouldn't we?

Because Black Monday for scouts and personnel is the day after the Draft. Thats the end of the 'season' for them. Right now they're knee deep in their teams scouting so it'd be a hard ask to have one jump to another team while they're so busy getting ready for the draft. Only reason why GM's are the exception is because they set the standard, and they're needed to make decisions and plan for free agency as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Scott, or someone else that knows about front office stuff.... Is there a good chance of us hiring Dan Morgan? I would think he would rather live in Charlotte and if Joe Person is already saying it, he must be hearing some sort of rumors from within the building right? Appreciate a response if possible here, really interested. Thank guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jared Patterson said:

Mr. Scott, or someone else that knows about front office stuff.... Is there a good chance of us hiring Dan Morgan? I would think he would rather live in Charlotte and if Joe Person is already saying it, he must be hearing some sort of rumors from within the building right? Appreciate a response if possible here, really interested. Thank guys!

He's not necessarily hearing a rumor. Just connecting the dots.

Yeah, it's possible. But it might not happen quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tennessee just fired their coach.  I guess thats good to do before he completely destroys ward.  I dont know though
    • Y'all are funny. and dumb. The argument I am seeing now if he can only be considered good if he WRs are trash or the play call has to make it hard for him? WTF haha
    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
×
×
  • Create New...