Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport: Panthers expected to be in the mix for Watson.


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Financially (and this may have been said in the 37 pages before this) the only way I would do it is we can unload 2 big contracts here---Shaq and TB.  That would be about equal to Watson....It aint happening.  I think he will be a Jet.

Teddy almost HAS to be included in any deal.  We cannot realistically have both Teddys and Watsons contracts on our books at the same time.  I dont think releasing TB is any option either.  So, unless Teddy goes to Houston, or we find another trading partner for him, we would probably be dead in the water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joemac said:

Teddy almost HAS to be included in any deal.  We cannot realistically have both Teddys and Watsons contracts on our books at the same time.  I dont think releasing TB is any option either.  So, unless Teddy goes to Houston, or we find another trading partner for him, we would probably be dead in the water.

Releasing TB and trading TB is basically the same thing in terms of the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Releasing TB and trading TB is basically the same thing in terms of the cap.

Spotrac wasn't clear on any difference between a cut and trade but overthecap suggests that we'd get considerably more cap space if we traded TB:

 

https://overthecap.com/player/teddy-bridgewater/2971/

 

According to this, releasing him would be $20M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Trading him would be $10M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Also, it says if we trade him post-June 1 it would be just $5M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

Spotrac wasn't clear on any difference between a cut and trade but overthecap suggests that we'd get considerably more cap space if we traded TB:

 

https://overthecap.com/player/teddy-bridgewater/2971/

 

According to this, releasing him would be $20M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Trading him would be $10M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Also, it says if we trade him post-June 1 it would be just $5M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year...

Then let's hope we can trade him for literally anything. Conditional 7th rounder? Yes please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Then let's hope we can trade him for literally anything. Conditional 7th rounder? Yes please.

More likely we'd have to give up a 4th or 5th (or more) and Teddy for a conditional 7th or something. He has negative value for any team acquiring him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, t96 said:

Spotrac wasn't clear on any difference between a cut and trade but overthecap suggests that we'd get considerably more cap space if we traded TB:

 

https://overthecap.com/player/teddy-bridgewater/2971/

 

According to this, releasing him would be $20M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Trading him would be $10M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year. Also, it says if we trade him post-June 1 it would be just $5M dead money this year and $5M dead money next year...

 

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Then let's hope we can trade him for literally anything. Conditional 7th rounder? Yes please.

$10m of his guaranteed money is in the form of guaranteed salary, specifically $10m this year.

Guaranteed salary can be traded, if we cut him we owe it, if we trade him possible not.  That is why you are seeing the different numbers.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would take the giants roster over Panthers. Lawrence, 3 OLB/DEs, Thomas, and nabers. Lawrence is better than dbrown and Thomas is better than icky. Panthers don't have one edge that would start over those 3 not matter how people feel about burns. Id believe....I think I would take nabers over the whole WR group....Id need to think about, but I feel it is right or 50/50..... Now after the top 10, Panthers may have claim. Im just not that big of a NFL fan like past time to make a good case. I'd just take giants on their top talent.    I will say this, if BY carries this team to the playoffs, he alone would flip this. 
    • Looks like he ran out of real estate.  He had 5 total TDs. As good as we have ever seen in Carolina? Looks like he is the only QB in our history with 3 passing and 2 rushing TDs and he tied a single game record of 5 TDs in one game with Cam and Beurlein.  Throw in his 73.4% completions and zero turnovers, literally the ONLY thing you could argue against statistically is total yardage which was only 275.  You may not agree with that statement (not 100% sure I do), but it's really not THAT wild...
    • I have for too long lacked giving good posting beers, fire, etc.  Good post, its beyond prove it time and until then 30s is where they belong. 
×
×
  • Create New...