Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Devin White... Micah Parsons


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

He is a helluva a player. But if the team is taking a more analytical approach, positional value speaking, he is not worth it.

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, musicman said:

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

but to reply to your question, with my opinion, I believe if we do not go QB, and we stay at 8 - Micha has the most immediate impact at 8. that said, i think if we do not go QB we should trade down because we need multiple picks to rebuild our offensive line. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ericr0319 said:

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

gees man. Im stating the obvious. Im NOT saying they wont get him, but any amount of reading will show that at #8 an off the line LB is not the BEST value. Chill dude. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, musicman said:

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

I'm for drafting a MLB, just not at #8.  Parsons is no Luke...very good, but not a generational-type talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Parsons a ton as yes good as a rusher too so he had more impact than most MLBs. Wouldn't be mad at the pick.

But eh. Would rather trade back. Secondary abd O-line are a much bigger need than MLB. Shaq and JCJ are solid enough and theres some decent LBs on the market and in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the bpa at 8 is a Lb then you look for a trade partner. We already have an expensive 1st pick LB with great athleticism. You don't win today collecting top quality LBs. They don't effect the game enough to matter, the ball is tossed over their head down field, and to make matters worse Parsons is not good at defending the pass, so we'd get wrecked. No more bad decisions. We need to build up our passing attack in the draft until we are a dominant passing team. A LB can be added later in the draft if needed (P.S not needed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

To his defense, he never stated that he knew what the team is thinking...that’s why he said “if”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'm for drafting a MLB, just not at #8.  Parsons is no Luke...very good, but not a generational-type talent.

8 is no mans land in the draft. its one of those spots where most players are not a value pick, but then the TOP guys if they fall to 8 is like a question mark...8 is seems like a spot you either trade up from or a trade back to a team that once to trade up to land a guy we made not need. 

i see at 8 a lot of teams wanting to nab a WR that we dont need

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...