Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Food for choice

Beerfacedlegend

By Beerfacedlegend,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He threw for more TDs this year in 10 games than Teddy has ever thrown in a season. Teddy's career INT percentage is 50% higher too. I'm not sitting here arguing that Trubisky is the answer, but he's better than Teddy. Teddy turns it over more often while throwing for less TDs.

He is better than Teddy but do you really want to go 7-9 instead of 5-11? IMO there's no point in bringing Mitch on in anything other than a backup position.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

*Bears only team not to have a 4000 yard passer ever*

*Bears historically anemic at QB*

*Bears decline 5th year option for QB*

Huddlers: Guys this QB is secretly good

This comes from a guy who's profile picture is one of the worst starting QB we've ever had.

If we draft a QB than of course we wouldn't sign him.  

So I assume you would rather go into 2021 with the same anemic QB we have now than to give a QB that has had some good games and some bad games a chance.

Had Robinson not dropped that wide open, perfectly throw bomb from Trubisky in the wildcard game.  Chicago may have won that game against New Orleans.  I consider New Orleans to have had one of the best defenses in the NFL and he stood firm against them.  They lost but you couldn't put the blame on him.   

IMO, at least, gives us an opportunity to take a look.

You make it sound as if we are trying to bring Josh Allen in.  Tribusky has his faults but he also shown he can play with the big boys. 

Do I want to offer him a huge contract? No. Do I think if we can get him under a one or two year deal that makes sense.  Why not.

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why does the Huddle want any a FA just because TB sucks, or give up assets? The blueprint we are probably, and should be following is the Chiefs, Bills, Browns, Ravens, Cardinals blueprint. Because it is the best for long term success. A FA is not and neither is giving everything a way.

Unfortunately, the results are not quick and some instant gratification fans can’t comprehend that. It may take more than one draft, or longer than a year to develop a QB/team but it has a better chance of long term success.

TB is a bridge QB, as we all know, as the coaches and FO know looking at his contract. Let’s use him as such as the bridge to the new long term answer at QB then spend years going through FAs or spend an eternity of assets get squeak in the playoffs every years only to fail as an incomplete team.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, onmyown said:

Why does the Huddle want any a FA just because TB sucks, or give up assets? The blueprint we are probably, and should be following is the Chiefs, Bills, Browns, Ravens, Cardinals blueprint. Because it is the best for long term success. A FA is not and neither is giving everything a way.

Unfortunately, the results are not quick and some instant gratification fans can’t comprehend that. It may take more than one draft, or longer than a year to develop a QB/team but it has a better chance of long term success.

TB is a bridge QB, as we all know, as the coaches and FO know looking at his contract. Let’s use him as such as the bridge to the new long term answer at QB then spend years going through FAs or spend an eternity of assets get squeak in the playoffs every years only to fail as an incomplete team.

Meanwhile, the bridge...

bsbridge1.jpg?w=533

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Bryce Young ready to get back to work, grow as a leader

      By frankw · Posted

      The issue is there's 16 games worth of tape on Bryce Young. His bad habits are going to be immediately amplified if he reverts to them. Defenses are waiting for it. Also as another poster above rightly pointed out. He's got to start putting some oomph on these passes. That's also on tape. That's why us fans and his first GM who was fired wanted him to get into the weight room at any capacity but he took time off to do nothing. Whatever happens it won't be for a lack of trying. I think Dave Canales is the right hire to work with a QB like Bryce. The issue is we have no idea if he is the right hire to fix the overall offense and team or how he will handle that level of responsibility on gamedays with only one year of coordinating. I think think this is either going to go really well or it's going to spiral. For all the talk of how bad Reich was and yes he was we really got much worse after he was fired and that's what Canales is inheriting. All of this is why I say it is important we have another young QB around just in case. Even a UFA. Also drafting a center for Bryce or whomever. We just need something anything to build on. Sustaining drives and getting into the end zone more often should be goals 1-3. We were h-o-r-r-e-n-d-o-u-s.
    • Jon Snow
      Why is no one considering double dip at WR?

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      What Morgan should be focusing on it getting the best players from the draft group that is available to him this year. If that happens to be a defensive player he shouldn't pass on the guy just because he needs offensive talent. Especially if what's available for offensive help is not on the same level of said defensive player. It just comes down to who's still on the board when he picks. Not every position need can or will be addressed in this draft. It simply will not happen because no team is that lucky for one thing and this team is in bad, really bad shape. Secondly, no draft is filled with enough talent to allow for any team to walk away with more than one possible starter and one or two contributors in any one draft. I think everyone needs to curb their expectations about this year's draft.
    • mrcompletely11
      Bryce Young ready to get back to work, grow as a leader

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      BUT HES COOKING!!!!11!!!1!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...