Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford-Goff swap is happening


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Person pointed out that even if it does, they're in a very good position to trade back if someone else wanted to move into that spot and take a quarterback.

We could get them a 3rd or something along those lines and they'd basically be getting a pick for free with us taking a QB and then them taking whoever they would've taken at #7 at #8. #7 plus next year's 3rd is what the value chart says. #7 plus this year's 3rd would give them considerably over chart value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Trading Teddy is going to require us giving up draft capital. I said this before the Stafford trade.

At this point it makes way more sense to keep him and draft a QB. Either way we can cut him next year without much worry. I worry way more about CMC and Shaqs contracts then I do about Bridgewaters. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We could get them a 3rd or something along those lines and they'd basically be getting a pick for free with us taking a QB and then them taking whoever they would've taken at #7 at #8. #7 plus next year's 3rd is what the value chart says. #7 plus this year's 3rd would give them considerably over chart value.

I know the team is gung-ho to get a quarterback this year, but I'm increasingly less convinced it's going to be possible to get a true quarterback of the future.

it feels like if we do acquire one, it's gonna be somebody around the quality of Mac Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know the team is gung-ho to get a quarterback this year, but I'm increasingly less convinced it's going to be possible to get a true quarterback of the future.

it feels like if we do acquire one, it's gonna be somebody around the quality of Mac Jones.

I'd honestly rather accumulate future draft capital and go after Howell or Rattler next year. Jones just ain't it. He's likely a Goff or Cousins at best.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Rams haven't had a 1st round pick since 2016 yet they've had four consecutive winning seasons. That's the type of consistent success a Panthers fan could only dream about.

god forbid this organization ever does something like that the way this community beats off over panthers first round picks

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd honestly rather accumulate future draft capital and go after Howell or Rattler next year. Jones just ain't it. He's likely a Goff or Cousins at best.

That probably depends on two things, the first being how patient David Tepper is willing to be.

But the second, and more significant factor, what does Matt Rhule really think about Mac Jones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

kramer smoking GIF by HULU

To the "But the Lions are going to draft our QB!!!!", crowd.   You can officially chill the heck out and pour an ice cold bucket of water over your heads.

Believe it or not, Adam Schefter says that's still possible.

What worries me more though is we thought that somebody else who wants a quarterback badly trades up with them.

A couple of different sources of pointed out that the Lions would be in a really good spot to trade down now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know the team is gung-ho to get a quarterback this year, but I'm increasingly less convinced it's going to be possible to get a true quarterback of the future.

it feels like if we do acquire one, it's gonna be somebody around the quality of Mac Jones.

Man don’t say that. I can’t stand another year of Trashwater under center. I am still positive the Panthers will trade up or get Lance. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Believe it or not, Adam Schefter says that's still possible.

What worries me more though is we thought that somebody else who wants a quarterback badly trades up with them.

A couple of different sources of pointed out that the Lions would be in a really good spot to trade down now.

San Francisco and Denver are the only two that come to mind unless someone comes from way back in the pack.  While both of those teams have "iffy" QB situations, they are not dire situations.  Both of those teams could just as likely go into 2021 with their current guy.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Man don’t say that. I can’t stand another year of Trashwater under center. I am still positive the Panthers will trade up or get Lance. 
 

It's not an absolute that we go into another year with Bridgewater. Just we might not get a franchise guy.

It's also possible we get another bridge guy / reclamation project like Trubisky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...