Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guy makes a lot of sense about us and Watson. (Good Read)


Big Sexy
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Big Sexy said:

The problem I have with Bridgewater isnt his skill set, even thought that could be improved.  It's his decisions in the clutch are what eats at me.  Even if their was another qb available with many of the same characteristics as TB thats fine as long has he is a guy with more moxy who doesnt take the big sack and is more dependable in the clutch.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I agreed with everything here except his Derek Carr comments. 

Agreed. Carr is good, Gruden just always thinks the QB grass is greener on the other side of the fence. If Gruden stupidly parts ways with him we should absolutely be (very) interested. We just made a very aggressive trade offer for a QB with virtually identical stats this season who is four years older.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

The  best comment in the article was  :  The bigger risk , is not taking one at all " 

Not addressing the QB situation this off season just puts us another year in waiting. 

I don't agree with this. I'd honestly rather do nothing at all than send #8 and more to Philly for Wentz.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t think we are in on the wentz deal they said colts and bears. What I heard bears are the front runners

If we strike out on Watson and strike out in the draft, Trubisky would be an upgrade from Teddy. I just wouldn't want to pay him elite money. I mean, you wouldn't have to but his contract plus Teddy's dead money would equal elite money.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t think we are in on the wentz deal they said colts and bears. What I heard bears are the front runners

I have heard absolutely nothing about us and Wentz. I have heard everything about us and Watson. We are as all in as all in can get, and Watson wants to be here. It's either us or he stays a Texan.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't agree with this. I'd honestly rather do nothing at all than send #8 and more to Philly for Wentz.

I don't think we're looking at Wentz,,  but if we were..  I'd rather try that than to sit with Teddy another season..  staying with Teddy is not moving forward....  It'll be another year of  4- 7 wins and we won't be in better shape in doing this.  

I would not take  Jimmy Clausen for a number 8 pick..   I don't think Wentz will even get a number one pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

I don't think we're looking at Wentz,,  but if we were..  I'd rather try that than to sit with Teddy another season..  staying with Teddy is not moving forward....  It'll be another year of  4- 7 wins and we won't be in better shape in doing this.  

I would not take  Jimmy Clausen for a number 8 pick..   I don't think Wentz will even get a number one pick.  

If we strike out on Watson and strike out in the draft, I'm ready to cut Teddy and just let Grier deliver that '22 #1 overall pick. 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we strike out on Watson and strike out in the draft, I'm ready to cut Teddy and just let Grier deliver that '22 #1 overall pick. 

This is not going to happen. If we do not land Watson we will trade up for a QB or find some other QB on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...