Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Voth on the QB situation...


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Ok now I can't stop:
Gated Brewed Dirty
Gyrated Bird Tweed (roflmao)
Tragedy Birded Wet (hahah)
Raged Biddy Wetter (omg)
Graded Bitter Dewy
Daddy Brig Tweeter 

Dab Dredger Ye Twit
Debated Grid We Try
Badder Ed We Gritty (pahaha)

Grab Redyed Dew Tit (don't tho)
Bar Deed Ditty Grew

lol omg I have too much fun with this poo man

I am in your head!!!!  Grab Redyed Dew Tit.   If I had a nickel....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Ok now I can't stop:
Gated Brewed Dirty
Gyrated Bird Tweed (roflmao)
Tragedy Birded Wet (hahah)
Raged Biddy Wetter (omg)
Graded Bitter Dewy
Daddy Brig Tweeter 

Dab Dredger Ye Twit
Debated Grid We Try
Badder Ed We Gritty (pahaha)

Grab Redyed Dew Tit (don't tho)
Bar Deed Ditty Grew

lol omg I have too much fun with this poo man

You okay? 🤔

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't mind that, and we'd be doing so with a better talent evaluator running the process.

This free agency period--with the reduced cap and elite names wanting fair market value--should leave quite a few talented players lying around on week 2.  I think we could find a few OL that way--maybe a DT--maybe even a LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

. In on every deal is something an idiot says.

That kinda bothered me too.  Not sure it was meant literally--but who knows?  We know they went after Stafford hard, no signs we went after Wentz (unless I missed a memo).  No rumblings about the possibility of Minshew, etc.I really do not know what that meant.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me if this sounds logical:

In all probability, we are staying with TB unless we trade away multiple first rounders and maybe a player or two.

I do not see sitting at #8 a plan to bring in a QB.  This is one of those years, when QBs are on the move--like musical chairs--and if you are not aggressive, you are standing alone when the music stops. 

vintage summer GIF by Jessica Lea Mayfield

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

That kinda bothered me too.  Not sure it was meant literally--but who knows?  We know they went after Stafford hard, no signs we went after Wentz (unless I missed a memo).  No rumblings about the possibility of Minshew, etc.I really do not know what that meant.

There are plenty of deals to not be in on. Like Wentz fixes anything at QB for us regardless of price? Just not a trust building statement.

We will see but I am uneasy with this current situation. I think the next 3 months will prove plenty, just not sure I am going to like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There are plenty of deals to not be in on. Like Wentz fixes anything at QB for us regardless of price? Just not a trust building statement.

We will see but I am uneasy with this current situation. I think the next 3 months will prove plenty, just not sure I am going to like it.

I don't mind being in on every deal. "In on every deal" doesn't necessarily mean actively competing in every deal. "In" could simply mean reaching out to check the temperature. It never hurts to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bigskypanthersguy said:

The point being, there is no short term viable option to fix the oline and I would prefer we have all our picks to accomplish that.

Frankly if Watson happens we would be better off with FA to fill that hole.

And all that cap space?

We do have other people to retain too and Watson's deal is an albatross.

And there is still no indication Houston wants to trade him.

And Moton getting extended may not happen.

People act like our O-Line was the worst line in the NFL last year or something.  I seem to remember a 3 or 4 game stretch last year where we did not give up one single sack.  We will have one anchor with Moton at T, there are options to be had out there to bolster the rest of it.  Personally, I don't think the OL situation is as bad as some around here make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bigskypanthersguy said:

We still seem to struggle with drafting oline.

Our new GM came from Seattle who struggles there too.

A lithe QB with an injury history with an experimental approach at best to an oline is not a recipe for success.

We are not even certain we can keep Moton and Paradis would be our next "best" olineman which says little.

You Watson proponents seem to think he is the only key piece we need.

Like it or not we are years away from being consistently competitive so frankly why the frenzy now when something else may open up down the road that is less expensive?

I know Watson is tantalizing.

But after giving up multiple picks and possibly defensive starters, how long does it take to replenish a cupboard that is sparse to begin with?

LOL we are not "years away" from being competitive.  We lost 7 or 8 one score games last season.  We were in nearly every single game to the very end.  Our main problem last year was a pansy, scared QB who was afraid to push the ball down the field at all times.  We replace Teddy with Deshaun last year, with the same team, and we probably win 10 games at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I'm not so sure I'm opposed to trading for GM, and just outright cutting Teddy.  Really don't want to mortgage the future on a player in this draft not named Trevor.

Don't want Teddy starting again and us eeking out 7 wins while pissing off the fans even further.

Shame.  Shame.  Shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...