Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Playoff teams stop someone every once in a while.

Yeah, like maybe, I dunno, 8 times at the end of the 4th quarter throughout the season giving the offense the ball back with enough time to mount a game winning drive in order to win a game?

Is 8 times once in a while? 

8 times seems like once in a while to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

The hate on for Teddy is beyond irrational. There's no up grade for Teddy available right now, but Jameis Winston and Mitchell Trubisky is out there if you really have to feed your bitterness.

I agree...the haters are out in force

if teddy had CMC & a good TE with any protection he would have done much better

CMC is our best player and he is a difference maker 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is this. No one is blaming the coaches or the defense for the Panther's problems. But they will be here when you get your savior. You all bragged about three receivers getting grand numbers, and you think that Brady did it. You also think that Teddy sacks himself, and throws short high percentage passes as though the revolving door at left tackle doesn't matter.

This is a very ungrateful group here. Teddy kept you relevant in at least 12 of the 16 games with a sucky defense, a sucky offensive line, a rookie head coach, and a rookie offensive coordinator. In spite of all of the suck around him, Teddy was competitive, he had positive numbers, and the next pick six he throws will be his first.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

I agree...the haters are out in force

if teddy had CMC & a good TE with any protection he would have done much better

CMC is our best player and he is a difference maker 

Agreed. There was no running game to speak of. All he had was the short passing game with smallish receivers.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

I agree...the haters are out in force

if teddy had CMC & a good TE with any protection he would have done much better

CMC is our best player and he is a difference maker 

This mind set is what should have changed after having a QB like Cam...

We don't have to accept bad QB play anymore...

Not everything is going to be perfect.. We need a QB that can still succeed when things don't go as plan or we don't have a perfect team situation... Consistent QB play leads to Consistent winning..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

All I know is this. No one is blaming the coaches or the defense for the Panther's problems. But they will be here when you get your savior. You all bragged about three receivers getting grand numbers, and you think that Brady did it. You also think that Teddy sacks himself, and throws short high percentage passes as though the revolving door at left tackle doesn't matter.

This is a very ungrateful group here. Teddy kept you relevant in at least 12 of the 16 games with a sucky defense, a sucky offensive line, a rookie head coach, and a rookie offensive coordinator. In spite of all of the suck around him, Teddy was competitive, he had positive numbers, and the next pick six he throws will be his first.

I thought ppl were joking.. But only Teddy would  say some dumb poo like this.. lmao

Kept us relevant?? What the fug are you talking about Teddy?? 

Keep patting yourself on the back for 15tds and 11ints thoe..lol

Being 0-8 in winning situation and blaming everything else is great leadership Teddy...lol

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah, like maybe, I dunno, 8 times at the end of the 4th quarter throughout the season giving the offense the ball back with enough time to mount a game winning drive in order to win a game?

Is 8 times once in a while? 

8 times seems like once in a while to me. 

I get it...it was really bad...Teddy was really bad

but CMC makes a difference

and we have no TE to help get those 6-7 yds we need on those drives

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scott12345 said:

I get it...it was really bad...Teddy was really bad

but CMC makes a difference

and we have no TE to help get those 6-7 yds we need on those drives

 

If a QB can't pull out 1 game out of 8 chances because he doesn't have his RB.. 

Why would you want him?? Or defend his bad play..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I thought ppl were joking.. But only Teddy would  say some dumb poo like this.. lmao

Kept us relevant?? What the fug are you talking about Teddy?? 

Keep patting yourself on the back for 15tds and 11ints thoe..lol

Being 0-8 in winning situation and blaming everything else is great leadership Teddy...lol

If you think blaming Teddy for that 0-8 situation makes you feel better, have at it. You are just setting yourself up for disappointment with your fixation on Teddy, who is more of the solution than the problem. If you insist on going down this reckless path of giving up assets for someone who can't help you, what's your solution for the defense and offensive line?

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

If you think blaming Teddy for that 0-8 situation makes you feel better, have at it. You are just setting yourself up for disappointment with your fixation on Teddy, who is more of the solution than the problem. If you insist on going down this reckless path of giving up assets for someone who can't help you, what's your solution for the defense and offensive line?

Teddy is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

If you think blaming Teddy for that 0-8 situation makes you feel better, have at it. You are just setting yourself up for disappointment with your fixation on Teddy, who is more of the solution than the problem. If you insist on going down this reckless path of giving up assets for someone who can't help you, what's your solution for the defense and offensive line?

A better QB who can cover for not being in a perfect situation... Like we had with Cam.. Or Atleast a avg. QB who could carry the team 1 out of the 8 opportunities giving to him.. Maybe just some one who has thrown 20tds in a season..lol

Teddy it isn't my fault you're a game manager it's yours...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

I really hope doesn't read the sewage on this thread.

He doesn't have to.. His coach and his owner are telling him the same thing... 

Oh and his stats are making it very clear if he didn't get it from them...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...