Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PantherKyle said:

Teddy apologists are some of my least favorite people. Just infuriating. He was drafted in 2014! Career high 15 TD! He is who he is, my god. 

Career High 15tds passes in 6 years says everything ..

CAREER HIGH!! 

End of debate..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Teddy Bridgewater is bad for the franchise.

Fixed it for you...

Bridgewater haters didn't force him into failing in 8 game winning situation..

Or make his  15td passing his career best total..

Lol

Stop it Teddy and get those bags packed..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

He doesn't have to.. His coach and his owner are telling him the same thing... 

Oh and his stats are making it very clear if he didn't get it from them...lol

Yeah they saying a lot with all these trade offers they are getting. Hell go ahead and get the risk it biscuit guy, he's out there.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

If you think blaming Teddy for that 0-8 situation makes you feel better, have at it. You are just setting yourself up for disappointment with your fixation on Teddy, who is more of the solution than the problem. If you insist on going down this reckless path of giving up assets for someone who can't help you, what's your solution for the defense and offensive line?

Just keep hammering away at those strawmen.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

What strawmen? Are you saying that the defense and offensive line are just fine and that the quarterback is the problem. Or you just want another quarterback, and to hell with everything else.

Well Teddy is Teddy but another quarterback could be anything. He could even be the BOAT! You know how much we've wanted one of those. 

I'll take the mystery QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

What strawmen? Are you saying that the defense and offensive line are just fine and that the quarterback is the problem. Or you just want another quarterback, and to hell with everything else.

No one has said QB is the only issue and yet your comments like this continue to present that thought like it's the prevailing opinion. It's a given that other areas of the team need attention as well, but in a thread about the QB it's quite reasonable for the focus to be on the QB position.

If you truly wish to discuss those other points and share your thoughts, starting a new thread on it would be a more productive action than setting up strawmen in this QB-focused one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...