Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For Zach Wilson fans...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude we have a ton of holes.  We need a safety, corners, olineman, te, and dline depth and of course a qb.   We have a poo ton of holes.  

Dline depth isn’t a hole. A hole is a starter. A hole is a glaring need, as far as I understand the word. TE isn’t a hole. Corner barely qualifies. Safety, maybe but Chinn and Burris is a fine combo to me. The only holes I see are a couple OL, corner kinda, MLB. And we have a fair amount of cap space to get FAs for those holes if we’re drafting a QB

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I understand what you're saying but we need a QB over all other positions right now. A good QB mitigates weaknesses throughout the roster. The trade up would be worth it to me. There are other rounds than just the first and good GM's can find good players in those rounds too. 

To trade up to Miami's spot....we could offer them every 2021 draft pick we got.  And there response would be....AND? 

I'd still rather draft Parson's vs that and then go after Sam Darnold if those are my two options. 

I'd rather sit at #8.  See if a QB falls.  Not get crazy ahead of time.  We see QBs fall all the time.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That’s fine, but based on my own watching of all the videos youtube has to offer, Wilson has skills that Fields just hasn’t shown yet. And a better arm and better throws.  There isn’t really anything you can say Fields had an advantage in except size and the team he played for.  In my opinion. 

Well, if you put on Field's best tape vs Wilson's best tape.....I say Field's wins that battle. 

Go watch Field's bust up Clemson.  One of the top 3 programs in all of college football with the best defensive coordinator in the game.   Clemson's D might not be Bama in terms of bodies....but what he went up against wasn't a joke. What is Wilson's best tape? 

 I'd also say Field's 2019 seasons was better than Wilson's 2020.   I don't think enough acknowledge how crazy the roster changes were for Ohio St week to week in 2020.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Well, if you put on Field's best tape vs Wilson's best tape.....I say Field's wins that battle. 

Go watch Field's bust up Clemson.  One of the top 3 programs in all of college football with the best defensive coordinator in the game.   Clemson's D might not be Bama in terms of bodies....but what he went up against wasn't a joke. What is Wilson's best tape? 

 I'd also say Field's 2019 seasons was better than Wilson's 2020.   I don't think enough acknowledge how crazy the roster changes were for Ohio St week to week in 2020.  

Yea I get what you’re saying. But I tend to look at prospects a different way, looking for specific traits rather than just how they played as a whole. In my mind, it helps weed out the “who they have around them” and “who they played against” factors. Fields hasn’t shown the ability to make reads and Wilson has better pass placement and range on his throws. Fields has been more limited. Doesn’t mean I don’t think Fields can make the reads and the throws, just means I haven’t seen it like I have with Wilson. 
 

and from your lips to God’s ears my friend. Watson is a best case scenario, pretty much regardless of the cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

To trade up to Miami's spot....we could offer them every 2021 draft pick we got.  And there response would be....AND? 

I'd still rather draft Parson's vs that and then go after Sam Darnold if those are my two options. 

I'd rather sit at #8.  See if a QB falls.  Not get crazy ahead of time.  We see QBs fall all the time.  

 

 

My argument against that is we had the best MLB in a generation in 2019 and no QB and our team was butthole. 

QB makes the whole team go. Without one, we are not going to win anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

My argument against that is we had the best MLB in a generation in 2019 and no QB and our team was butthole. 

QB makes the whole team go. Without one, we are not going to win anything. 

That butthole team won more games than Watson's butthole team this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Yea I get what you’re saying. But I tend to look at prospects a different way, looking for specific traits rather than just how they played as a whole. In my mind, it helps weed out the “who they have around them” and “who they played against” factors. Fields hasn’t shown the ability to make reads and Wilson has better pass placement and range on his throws. Fields has been more limited. Doesn’t mean I don’t think Fields can make the reads and the throws, just means I haven’t seen it like I have with Wilson. 
 

and from your lips to God’s ears my friend. Watson is a best case scenario, pretty much regardless of the cost. 

I still feel there is some weird pro Wilson/anti Fields campaign that was launched.  

Take ball placement/accuracy.  That is Field’s strength.   Probably an argument  he is the #1 QB in the draft in that aspect. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

My argument against that is we had the best MLB in a generation in 2019 and no QB and our team was butthole. 

QB makes the whole team go. Without one, we are not going to win anything. 

again, I don’t disagree the QB is the piece  that matters most.   Which is why I won’t complain about the farm being given up for Watson. 

but Zach Wilson isn’t Watson.  Draft him at 8? Cool. I don’t love him but won’t complain.   Trade up to 3? Not worth it to me.  Cost far too high for that lotto scratch off.   

and best compliment you can give a QB is a D.  So if we aren’t investing in a QB with the first pick I lean what would aid in our current D getting better.   Huge hole at the second level right now.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Dline depth isn’t a hole. A hole is a starter. A hole is a glaring need, as far as I understand the word. TE isn’t a hole. Corner barely qualifies. Safety, maybe but Chinn and Burris is a fine combo to me. The only holes I see are a couple OL, corner kinda, MLB. And we have a fair amount of cap space to get FAs for those holes if we’re drafting a QB

Dline is massive hole on this roster. We need a 3 technique who can bring pressure up the middle. D.Brown should improve with age, but he's more of a NT type. He is double teamed most of the time. We need someone beside him who can bring some heat, which  make things easier for Brown. You need to take a look at years stats. We had 29 sacks as a team. Brian Burns had 9 of them. Efe Obada had 5.5. No one else had more than 5. None of our DT's had more than 2. A lot of people want to blame Teddy for all of our problems last year, but Carolina's defense gave up on average over 25 points per game. Part of that is due to a lack of a consistent pass rush. We also gave up 4.7 yds per rush on average on the ground.

The team  only had 7 interceptions and 3 of those  were by a Donte Jackson, the only CB on the team to get an INT.   I think that more than qualifies as a roster hole. Three of our Safeties has 1 interception each, the last INT was by a LB (Tahir Whitehead). We can't assume a lot of free agents are going to be excited about playing for a 5-11 team this offseason. We need to fill these holes through the draft if possible. You can't do that if you give away everything to move up 5 or 6 spots in the draft and nab a QB.

Our guys played hard last year. I expect our 2nd year players to improve in 2021. But, when you look at our defensive stats, it amazing we were as competitve as we were in 2020. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I still feel there is some weird pro Wilson/anti Fields campaign that was launched.  

Take ball placement/accuracy.  That is Field’s strength.   Probably an argument  he is the #1 QB in the draft in that aspect. 

Did this campaign somehow force Fields to look bad in some of his biggest games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AU-panther said:

With no combine I wonder will teams get an accurate height/weight on him?

What is he listed at now? 

As far as the shoulder goes that is concerning, everyone likes to say Lance has the biggest bust chance, but if there are any shoulder concerns at all then really Wilson is the riskiest of the 4.  Teams are really going to have to trust their medical. 

Rumor is he's just two kids in a trenchcoat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CRA said:

I still feel there is some weird pro Wilson/anti Fields campaign that was launched.  

Take ball placement/accuracy.  That is Field’s strength.   Probably an argument  he is the #1 QB in the draft in that aspect. 

 


I don’t think it is some “campaign” to discredit Fields but instead some actual metrics that are a bit concerning when trying to predict the ability to translate to the next level. 

The question is, are these issues because he can’t or because he wasn’t asked to because of the system he was in. 

I do agree with you that his accuracy and arm talent is as great.  If you ask him to drop back and throw to his first read he is as good as anyone, including Trevor. 

Personally I’m higher on him than most because I think some of the so called perceived issues can be fixed with coaching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...