Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simms Just Released his 2021 QB Rankings


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I was looking for a spleen pun but couldn't come up with a good one.

Old Chinese saying: "May you live in interesting times."

Another one is: A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If I'm gonna take a shot at an inconsistent QB, I'd take a shot at a far more talented prospect who has played at a much higher level in Fields.

That was the first thought I had--but I will tell you---I am now going to go back and read up on Mond-Fields had a great OL--i see three draft picks in this year's draft--so I want to see if Mond's issues are based on supporting cast.

I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of this comes down to where the qb is drafted. Lamar went into an awesome organization. Wilson could be a better pro than Trevor depending on where Wilson goes. Trevor is at a disadvantage because of Jacksonville and urban Meyer.

Trey Lance could end up being the best if he finds the right team.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If I'm gonna take a shot at an inconsistent QB, I'd take a shot at a far more talented prospect who has played at a much higher level in Fields.

He might not be there when we pick, but yeah definitely Fields over Mond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Lot of this comes down to where the qb is drafted. Lamar went into an awesome organization. Wilson could be a better pro than Trevor depending on where Wilson goes. Trevor is at a disadvantage because of Jacksonville and urban Meyer.

Trey Lance could end up being the best if he finds the right team.

This is very true. I am a bit nervous about our team being a good spot for a QB to develop, admittedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also worth noting for the Wilson fanboys who bring up the fact Trevor and Fields played with better talent. 

Trevor played against more teams where the opponent had more talent than his team did  vs Wilson.  Plus the added fact Trevor was evading NFL talent coming at him on the DL.  Wilson wasn’t extending plays vs that. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Lot of this comes down to where the qb is drafted. Lamar went into an awesome organization. Wilson could be a better pro than Trevor depending on where Wilson goes. Trevor is at a disadvantage because of Jacksonville and urban Meyer.

Trey Lance could end up being the best if he finds the right team.

Trevor and Jacksonville

4 picks in the first 46 or so in the Draft

$82m in cap room.

So while you are right, some smart moves could change a lot.  They could seriously add 9-11 new starters this offseason.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Also worth noting for the Wilson fanboys who bring up the fact Trevor and Fields played with better talent. 

Trevor played against more teams where the opponent had more talent than his team did  vs Wilson.  Plus the added fact Trevor was evading NFL talent coming at him on the DL.  Wilson wasn’t extending plays vs that. 
 

 

I am not sure what he sees there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Another one is: A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion

But what if his own decision is to follow public opinion?  This is so confusing! 

No, good point.  Public opinion is based on pure emotion and familiarity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...