Trey Lance - best QB of this draft not named Lawrence

[OldhamA]

1 hour ago, SOJA said:

BUT THE HUDDLE ASSURED ME THERE WAS NO WAY THAT QBS COULD BE PICKS 1-4 

Some of you guys are legitimately nuts.

[Basbear]

51 minutes ago, joemac said:

I remember them making a huge deal out of the fact that he wore him helmet lol.

I forgot that part, but remember Teddy ones where he didnt use gloves and poo the bed..

 

Teddy should have learned what I did, "no glove no love"!!

[Basbear]

29 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Some of you guys are legitimately nuts.

[SOJA]

13 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Some of you guys are legitimately nuts.

yea people who don't understand positional value

[LinvilleGorge]

My preference of the non-Lawrence QBs is Wilson but it won't shock me if any out of Wilson, Fields, and Lance proves to be the best of the class. There's a lot to like about all three but legit reasons for concern too.

[NAS]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My preference of the non-Lawrence QBs is Wilson but it won't shock me if any out of Wilson, Fields, and Lance proves to be the best of the class. There's a lot to like about all three but legit reasons for concern too.

No risk it, no biscuit. If we want a safe pick, then we can just stick with Teddy

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

No risk it, no biscuit. If we want a safe pick, then we can just stick with Teddy

What I'm saying is I'm fine with drafting any of the three of them. 

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, NAS said:

No risk it, no biscuit. If we want a safe pick, then we can just stick with Teddy

As long as you don't move up I would agree.  It would be hard to swallow a stale brick biscuit that you spent your rent money on.

[NAS]

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

As long as you don't move up I would agree.  It would be hard to swallow a stale brick biscuit that you spent your rent money on.

That I can agree on, unless your confidence level from a scouting and evaluation perspective is extremely high

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, NAS said:

That I can agree on, unless your confidence level from a scouting and evaluation perspective is extremely high

Resist the temptation to over think it.  Sit tight and see how the cards fall.  Play the hand your dealt.  You get the idea.  There will be a really good player at 8.  We can use more of those everywhere except RB. 

[NAS]

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Resist the temptation to over think it.  Sit tight and see how the cards fall.  Play the hand your dealt.  You get the idea.  There will be a really good player at 8.  We can use more of those everywhere except RB. 

IDK, if your evaluation  says Lance is a high probability to be a franchise QB, then you don’t miss that opportunity. Of course you can’t mortgage too much but hoping to land someone next year or in FA is prescription for years of mediocrity

[Varking]

I’m okay moving up if it’s a simple swap of our first rounders this year plus 1 additional pick. When you start doing multiple firsts I hate it. 

[Varking]

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What I'm saying is I'm fine with drafting any of the three of them. 

That’s where I’m at. I can pick apart all three all day long or talk them up. Now is the time to be ultra critical though before we invest draft value. 

[MHS831]

20 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Some of you guys are legitimately nuts.

I have to agree.  We are.