Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Ticket is dead. Long live Sunday Ticket


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, PootieNunu said:

How can they? I can load up one website and watch any sporting event I want, not just football. 

Most you gotta get through ads and redirects to get there unless you're savvy enough with adblockers and they don't always stream to TV easily. Make it as easy and versatile as Netflix and many people would pay a flat fee just for the peace of mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Most you gotta get through ads and redirects to get there unless you're savvy enough with adblockers and they don't always stream to TV easily. Make it as easy and versatile as Netflix and many people would pay a flat fee just for the peace of mind. 

All good points. None of which would make me subscribe, but plenty of people would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better summary:

  • Starts with 2023 season, runs through 2033 season
  • MNF flex starts in week 12
  • Amazon gets TNF
  • ABC gets back into the Super Bowl rotation
  • ESPN+ will get "an exclusive (international) game" each year
  • Peacock will get "an exclusive feed of a select number of games"
  • ESPN/ABC will have three weeks on MNF with different games on each channel.... in addition to a Saturday doubleheader the final week of the season
  • CBS games will be carried on Paramount+  *no word on whether these will be geo-restricted
  • FOX games will be carried on TUBI  *no word on whether these will be geo-restricted 
  • FOX gets Xmas day games when schedule allows

And no mention of DirecTV and Sunday Ticket. 😞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

The hits keep coming.

MNF gets the ability to flex games too, so SNF doesn't get the only lucky part of the draw.

Will make traveling for games a bit more complicated late in the season, which is exactly what @RoaringRiot has been asking for, right?
 

 

Knowing our luck we’ll be fighting for the division at the end of the year and get a Sunday game flexed to MNF right before a TNF game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...