Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Also in civil cases there is no presumption whether someone is innocent or guilty. Just whether or not they owe redress. 
 

In which case it’s pretty obvious deshaun owes something. 

That's taking it a bit far. That's what the trial(s) determine.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

He is not entitled to a presumption of innocence. You’re just using words you don’t understand. Unless you know more than like every law review in the country. 

Like literally the first google search from Virginia law review 

The presumption of innocence represents a political and moral consensus that criminal defendants should not be subject to punishment until adjudicated guilty under a strict standard of proof. Although this concept has long been recognized as the hallmark of the criminal law, its potential application to civil proceedings has been largely neglected. Civil defendants enjoy no presumption of innocence. 

In my opinion due process and the presumption of innocence are inextricably linked...

...you are entitled to think otherwise, America is a free country after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:
38 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Also in civil cases there is no presumption whether someone is innocent or guilty. Just whether or not they owe redress. 
 

In which case it’s pretty obvious deshaun owes something. 

That's taking it a bit far. That's what the trial(s) determine.

Agreed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Lmao moving on to “well I don’t know if this pattern of sexual assault deserves redress” is a hell of a take 

Just skip the entire judicial process  and dish out punishment is a hell of a take.  You aren't making a lick of sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not going to infer whether he’s innocent or guilty but some of you making excuses for men seeking out Instagram models while they’re in relationships tells all about your character and your attachment to athletes when you can justify it to yourself that this level of filth is “OK.”

Edited by WarHeel
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

I’m not going to infer whether he’s innocent or guilty but some of you making excuses for men seeking out Instagram models while they’re in relationships tells all about your character and your attachment to athletes when you can justify it to yourself that this level of filth is “OK.”

Yeah, this coupled with him trying to force his way out of his new contract already doesn't give me great feelings about his character. Though again, it's just my hunch not a verdict.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, electro's horse said:

well every complaint alleges he was just randomly looking for people on instagram and there will presumably be evidence of this but nah all these women are SLUTS DOWN TO GIVE AN OLD FASHIONED

TMZ's sources say Watson didn't find the massage therapists "out of the blue." He reportedly reached out to various friends, teammates and associates to get recommendations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...