Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orlovsky on Trey Lance


Troys99x4
 Share

Recommended Posts

If I was a GM I would probably be fired within a couple years as I would probably be too much of a risk taker. I would end up taking a chance on this guy. I get a strong feeling he will either be boom or bust and nothing in between but if he checked out okay in an interview and seemed to have a good attitude and willingness to be coached I would take that chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Untouchable said:

Dude is 19 years old in that highlight, it's a mechanics issue that will lead to inconsistencies, not a fatal flaw. Coach him up and profit.

His mechanics have got significantly worse with a year away from live action. Just watch the game he played last year. 🤮

I'm all for taking Lance, but not with a Top 10 pick. He's such a massive roll of the dice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Does anyone remember any of these footwork and mechanics questions when Carolina drafted Cam Newton?

Oh, and he's never changed any of it, although there were glimpses of a change after a few injuries, but he is basically the same mechanical QB the Panthers drafted. 

Exactly.

Allen is the outlier - a QB that's gone away and significantly improved his mechanics. 

At such a technical position like QB, where you don't have time to think about your mechanics (because you're trying not to think about the 300lb man trying to rip your head off as you process the defence), it's very difficult to rework what at 21/22 is now very natural to you. 

 

To be fair to Lance, he has such limited experience as a QB that potentially his mechanics aren't ingrained yet, so you could stash him for a year away from said 300lb killers and rework what you need to. 

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upside is great and all, but you have to get them there.

I never thought that we captured Cam's upside...at least not consistently...and I don't think that Lance has that type of upside.

That said, this is a much better front office and coaching staff than what Cam had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Lance isn't Newton.

Sometimes I think people forget just how special an athlete Cam Newton was.

Yep. Cam was a one of a kind. His rushing TDs as a QB is one of those records that's going to be really tough for anyone to break. He has more rushing TDs than some HOF RBs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

Upside is great and all, but you have to get them there.

I never thought that we captured Cam's upside...at least not consistently...and I don't think that Lance has that type of upside.

That said, this is a much better front office and coaching staff than what Cam had.

I'm in the minority here, but I didn't want Newton with the #1 overall pick.

After we selected him I thought we should have gone all in on the Auburn offence that he was so successful in.

Granted he'd be retired now, but he'd probably have a Super Bowl ring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Does anyone remember any of these footwork and mechanics questions when Carolina drafted Cam Newton?

Oh, and he's never changed any of it, although there were glimpses of a change after a few injuries, but he is basically the same mechanical QB the Panthers drafted. 

I'm honestly not convinced we ever made a legit (or any) effort to actually help Cam's mechanics. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. Cam was a one of a kind. His rushing TDs as a QB is one of those records that's going to be really tough for anyone to break.

Football fans sometimes act like guys that are missing old girlfriends.

We see an athletic quarterback and we say "Oh my gosh, it's Cam Newton".

We see a fast, undersized receiver and we say "Look, it's Steve Smith".

And yes, it's possible that someone could come out who's as good as those guys, but we need to be really careful about projecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm honestly not convinced we ever made a legit (or any) effort to actually help Cam's mechanics. 

Igo talked about Hurney and Rivera being afraid to challenge him for fear they'd make him mad.

More than one person said Ken Dorsey was more like a buddy than a coach, but look at what Dorsey's been able to do for Josh Allen.

I get the feeling that if we knew everything, we'd probably find out that the old regime was even worse than we ever knew.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

I'm in the minority here, but I didn't want Newton with the #1 overall pick.

After we selected him I thought we should have gone all in on the Auburn offence that he was so successful in.

Granted he'd be retired now, but he'd probably have a Super Bowl ring. 

We had the chance to really do something special with him, but we boofed it.

Mostly because of Jerry, Marty, and Ron.  They wanted an outdated football team, and Cam was more than willing.  The Panthers messed up their best opportunity over the last 20 years...but that's pretty normal around that headquarters.

Hell we blew the last 3 off seasons just to win 15 games over 3 seasons...or however many we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Igo talked about Hurney and Rivera being afraid to challenge him for fear they'd make him mad.

More than one person said Ken Dorsey was more like a buddy than a coach, but look at what Dorsey's been able to do for Josh Allen.

I get the feeling that if we knew everything, we'd probably find out that the old regime was even worse than we ever knew.

I 100% agree with this notion.

Ron and Marty did Cam NO FAVORS....however, Cam was part of that as well.  Lots of blame to go around over the past decade or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Igo talked about Hurney and Rivera being afraid to challenge him for fear they'd make him mad.

More than one person said Ken Dorsey was more like a buddy than a coach, but look at what Dorsey's been able to do for Josh Allen.

I get the feeling that if we knew everything, we'd probably find out that the old regime was even worse than we ever knew.

Agreed. We'd be even more pissed at the former staff and even more aware that we essentially wasted the career of one of the most physically gifted QBs ever

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...