Fitterer and Brady at Zach Wilson pro day

[ForJimmy]

8 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

We really F'd up letting them get ahead of us in this draft. In battle you may have to retreat. Know when getting a higher pick outweighs ego.

Letting them get ahead? We played to win. It’s what every team should do.

[Ready 2 Win]

It is what is it. 

A company paid trip to get away from the wife and family for a few days. Maybe look at a player we might make a run at but really...its just a good ass reason to get paid to get an often times needed break from family. 

Cheers to them!

[t96]

42 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Too damn expensive and a has injury concerns. Do that due diligence tho, very good.

What injury concerns?

[Waldo]

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

for awhile I was pretty certain a QB would get to 8.  I flip flop on it.  Earlier I just though the media was overhyping it because QBs are just more fun to talk about and get clicks.   4 in the top 10 is pretty high.  You don't see that.  And we aren't dealing w/ 4 Trevors. 

QB is more fun but also the most important position in a team game. I just think the consensus is never 100% and this year it should be lot off. Usually there is 1 or 2 WTF picks in the top 10. What if there are double that this year? If your going to waste a pick, QB probably offers the best reward so that would push up the other 3 more this year. 

I also think that 2020 offered an uneven and hard to analyze year. I honestly don't have a clue how this will shake down, complete chaos to teams playing it safe to business as usual. Either way, 4 QBs better then what we have and 2 LTs that are legit...all we need is 2 teams to take  a LB, CB or Wr and we get a great shot to improve at 2 areas we are desperate for talent.

[*FreeFua*]

Spoiler alert

 

We’ll have staff at the Ohio State pro day 

[Waldo]

1 minute ago, t96 said:

What injury concerns?

Didn't Wilson have shoulder surgery? maybe nothing or maybe something.  

[imminent rogaine]

49 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Cant be much worse than Teddy but definitely not the answer. When you have one of the worst starting QBs in the league a lot of crazy poo will be said. 

I think that is a MoRon Rivera troll you are replying too though, sounds like him.

Absolutely can be much worse than Teddy. 

[mav1234]

18 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Absolutely can be much worse than Teddy. 

Definitely true... Teddy was nowhere near the worst QB in the league and far from the worst Panthers QB to play.  But we can't compete at a high level with him, and he underperformed for the talent at skill positions around him... 

And probably most frustrating was he did seem to have the ability to move the offense, just not anything clutch when it mattered...

[OldhamA]

59 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

If we can't trade up and the top 4 QBs are gone... I don't want to reach.  But certainly we need something new in our QB room...

Where has this this 'top 4 QB' phrase come from?

People throw it around like it's a fact. It really baffles me. 

[mav1234]

Just now, OldhamA said:

Where has this this 'top 4 QB' phrase come from?

People throw it around like it's a fact. It really baffles me. 

Most evaluators seem to indicate a strong drop off after that... Mond, Jones, Trask... ehhh.

[OldhamA]

8 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Most evaluators seem to indicate a strong drop off after that... Mond, Jones, Trask... ehhh.

Most credible evaluators have Jones as the #3 QB in the Draft. 

[mav1234]

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Most credible evaluators have Jones as the #3 QB in the Draft. 

Haha. Okay.  We are looking at different evaluators I guess. 

I think Jones will be a massive mistake if we take him at 8, but I'll be happy if I'm proven wrong. 

Maybe someone trades up and drafts him #3... hope it isn't us.

[Waldo]

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Most credible evaluators have Jones as the #3 QB in the Draft. 

That is a fast way to lose credibility.

[OldhamA]

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Haha. Okay.  We are looking at different evaluators I guess. 

I think Jones will be a massive mistake if we take him at 8, but I'll be happy if I'm proven wrong. 

Maybe someone trades up and drafts him #3... hope it isn't us.

Same, but for Fields. 

To me it's Wilson / Lawrence - big gap - Fields / Jones - gap - Lance (dude is all potential) - Mond - everyone else.