Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles trade #6 pick to Dolphins


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, davos said:

If ATL doesn't go QB it's LT.  That's the talk of all their circles.  Cinci is getting Burrow help...I don't know Miami's intentions yet (Chase?) but they've already got Austin Jackson as their LT.

So 4 QBs, 1 WR, Sewell, & Slater off?

So then, we could really be looking at Parsons, Pitts, or Waddle.

We’ll take parsons because panthers.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:
ZACH WILSONQB, COLLEGE PLAYER
zach_wilson.jpg

NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Eagles were interested to trading up to No. 3 overall, but only for BYU QB Zach Wilson. 

In other words, the Jets are locked in at Wilson at No. 2. After their designs on No. 3 were thwarted, the Eagles instead moved down to No. 12, getting a 2022 first-rounder from the Dolphins for the price of sliding only six spots. With Wilson seemingly the guy at No. 2, it would seem North Dakota State QB Trey Lance is the 49ers' most likely target at No. 3. 

Damn we fuged up so bad.

So, so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it too late to hire Doug Pederson to orchestrate our 2021 tank season? Because the chances of us being in the top 5 or top 10 again are gonna be low. I feel bad for CMC, DJ Moore, Brian Burns, Chinn, etc. 
 

Way to go Deshaun! You couldn’t just use PornHub like the rest of us?!

  • The D 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real question now is what ATL is going to do. Do they pick the last of the 4 QBs or go a different position? If ATL doesn't pick a QB then one of the four really can fall to us at 8 with Philly moving out of spot 6. Mia, Det, and Cincy don't need QBS. Unless someone leaps frog us again, we may still get a chance at a QB. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BleedinGreenNC said:

Thought this was a public forum? LOL!! Get ready for Teddy!

You'll need thicker skin than that to make it through another season my man. We have already witnessed Jimmy Clausen and David Carr wearing white gloves. This is child's play by comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...