Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Snake said:

We might have and lost out. 

According to Person, we weren't interested.

Still haven't seen anything to confirm we're talking to Short either.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

According to Person, we weren't interested.

Still haven't seen anything to confirm we're talking to Short either.

Alex Marvez on SiriusXM radio mentioned last week that there was interest on both sides. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Alex Marvez on SiriusXM radio mentioned last week that there was interest on both sides. 

I think we’re better off taking his replacement in the later rounds of the draft. There are some good ones to be had e.g. Nixon/Iowa, Johnson/Indiana or Tufele/USC. We need depth and youth there instead of a retread IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/1/2021 at 11:14 AM, stbugs said:

It should just be the minimum. He’s clearly gotten no interest and he was truly awful in the 2-3 games he played last year getting blown off the ball. Anything above minimum is dumb as a rotational guy who will likely be hurt at some point. Let him prove that he’s healthy and actually not done. His incentive is to not be out of the league and maybe get a new deal in 2022. We don’t owe him any incentives at this point. He stole $26M the past two years, well $13M and Marty was just stupid last year.

So what we learned is that Short requires a real 0 tech to play next to. Him and Star were a perfect duo for one another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no way I want us to waste a roster spot on the aged, injury prone, Short, who would be nothing more than a no show player taking up a much needed roster spot in the long run.

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

We need bodies at the DT position. We have yet to replace not only Kawann but Zach Kerr!

Nope, we've paid him a fortune for him to sit out with injuries.  F*ck that sh*t!

  • Pie 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

We need bodies at the DT position. We have yet to replace not only Kawann but Zach Kerr!

I'd rather we replaced Zach Kerr with Zach Kerr than this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...