Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing in the draft?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Verge has also said Washington will be aggressive in moving up for a QB.  I really hope one of the big 4 falls to us and if we take him and he flops, I'm ok with that.  You have to take a chance on a franchise QB when you have it.  

After that, OT or Pitts, but I don't think Pitts is getting past the Falcons.  They still have a franchise QB who could play 4 or 5 years, I think they try to win with him now.

Ready for the dadgum draft to get here already.  

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Verge said:

Based on what I have heard. This year has been tough on any rumors though. QB first priority and don't believe the noise we don't like Fields/Lance.

My god, I just can’t do another year of Bridgewater or a cast off

do you see trask, mond, or the Stanford qb...is there any hope of not seeing Teddy this year 

I really struggle, seeing how well fields dismantled Clemson AFTER getting hit how they would not take him if there 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Verge has also said Washington will be aggressive in moving up for a QB.  I really hope one of the big 4 falls to us and if we take him and he flops, I'm ok with that.  You have to take a chance on a franchise QB when you have it.  

After that, OT or Pitts, but I don't think Pitts is getting past the Falcons.  They still have a franchise QB who could play 4 or 5 years, I think they try to win with him now.

Ready for the dadgum draft to get here already.  

Are we really still using 'the big 4' when the QB people hate is going #3 overall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Verge whats the latest on Sewell? Ive seen him falling in the recent weeks, didnt know why... Plus a Slater up-date as well. Thanks

I think Slater will go before Sewell.

 

 

23 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Hey Verge, can we get one of your classic first round mock threads here pretty soon? Would be really appreciated 😊

I will do a mock the week of the draft. 

 

 

7 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Would taking surtain at 8 and sending our 2nd for JC jackson be overkill? 

Yep.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...