Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule "a fan" of Darnold


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

One season (where this board thought we would be the worst team in the league) and this is your take. Reasonable. Not reactionary in the slightest. Good for you

LoL. In 2015 we had a QB. Shake them pompoms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I had high hopes for Rhule, but I'm starting to really doubt that this ends up working out.

Replace the GM for Rhule and this is me. Tho I will put a big part of this Darnold mess at the feet of Thirst-master Tepper and his brilliant broadcast for a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

2015? That when you became a fan? Lol. I’ll just keep repeating, we all expected this to be a 3-4 year rebuild. It’s been one year. Calm your tits

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, X-TEM-X said:

Well it true we won't getting Top 4 QB on our 8th pick but can we grab Sewell or Slater first instead of Field/Lance?

Yea I would imagine who they have as bpa will be the pick. Either of those 2 tackles, Pitts or maybe even Chase(not likely I think Miami or Cincy grabs him) or a cb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

when you're sad and squad is there for you - GIF on Imgur

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

Both options are bad...we needed to actually start a rebuild last year. Not sign Teddy and not give that contract to CMC. We made bad decisions then and now we're in a bad spot. The panthers way.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

I just don't have much left to give to this lot. Not enough positives and I am tired of just huffing hope. This is another big move into absolute bleak for me. I went to my first game at Clemson against the 49ers, it hurts but it has been worse every year since 2015. It's beyond frustration, one fugging positive that was intentional and I could want to believe again. I'm ready for the next house cleaning before that. Maybe it is early but it is time for me. I am 100% against all at this time. Sooner that happens the sooner I have the opportunity to see Panther football in a positive again. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...