Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule "a fan" of Darnold


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

One season (where this board thought we would be the worst team in the league) and this is your take. Reasonable. Not reactionary in the slightest. Good for you

LoL. In 2015 we had a QB. Shake them pompoms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I had high hopes for Rhule, but I'm starting to really doubt that this ends up working out.

Replace the GM for Rhule and this is me. Tho I will put a big part of this Darnold mess at the feet of Thirst-master Tepper and his brilliant broadcast for a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

2015? That when you became a fan? Lol. I’ll just keep repeating, we all expected this to be a 3-4 year rebuild. It’s been one year. Calm your tits

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, X-TEM-X said:

Well it true we won't getting Top 4 QB on our 8th pick but can we grab Sewell or Slater first instead of Field/Lance?

Yea I would imagine who they have as bpa will be the pick. Either of those 2 tackles, Pitts or maybe even Chase(not likely I think Miami or Cincy grabs him) or a cb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There is no rebuild if they keep making terrible decisions. This is another epically bad move for the new crew. I am over all the BS. NFL is just about billionaires making a poo product. I wanted it to remain fun but it's feels dead now. Now all that is left is to enjoy the burning. 

Come on man, I am an ass but I have been here long enough. We are headed down, just admit it. Desperate owner with no meaningful experience and 10 years away from not sinking his own ship at least. HC with promise but in a bad situation and no help, we are his learning experince is failure incoming. GM that was a much weaker candidate that accepted because of the weird and ridiculous setup but hey he is likable. It all spells us being bottom dwellers for now. I respect you enough to admit that and not just lash out in frustration. This move is the equivalent of the LIttle pick and not many to admit it that I have cared to read. It's friggen bleak and time to realize the long haul is longer then anyone wanted, including me. You say 3-4 years and I have to wonder if ever. It's that bad. 

when you're sad and squad is there for you - GIF on Imgur

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

Both options are bad...we needed to actually start a rebuild last year. Not sign Teddy and not give that contract to CMC. We made bad decisions then and now we're in a bad spot. The panthers way.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I hear your frustration. But I’m a  fan of this team foe 20 years now and this don’t think you are being very measured. 
 

Darnold may not work out. If he doesn’t, he only costs us essentially a 2nd round pick. People wanted to trade three 1sts for a unproven rookie that played one game last year against no name competition. Tell me honestly, which sounds more unreasonable?

I just don't have much left to give to this lot. Not enough positives and I am tired of just huffing hope. This is another big move into absolute bleak for me. I went to my first game at Clemson against the 49ers, it hurts but it has been worse every year since 2015. It's beyond frustration, one fugging positive that was intentional and I could want to believe again. I'm ready for the next house cleaning before that. Maybe it is early but it is time for me. I am 100% against all at this time. Sooner that happens the sooner I have the opportunity to see Panther football in a positive again. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...