Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bengals sign thaddeus Moss does this effect pitts?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in 2015 NFL Draft

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

A lot of talk about the Bengals picking Chase. If I'm the Bengals I pick Sewell/Slater and look to get Burrows other teammate at LSU, Terrace Marshall early on the 2nd round. 

The Bengals have two young OTs who are pretty promising. They're probably going IOL pretty early and possibly pretty often though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Bengals have two young OTs who are pretty promising. They're probably going IOL pretty early and possibly pretty often though.

I see them drafting a LT and kicking Jonah Williams inside to guard where I see him being a good bit more effective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Veteran

micnificent28

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Signing a recent UDFA off the scrap heap has zero implications of what you are doing with the #5 overall pick.

With that said, go ahead and pencil in Ja'Marr Chase.

Most likely. But it looks like they plugging possible holes so they can draft bpa similar to what we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...