Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You Really Against Fields or Lance if they fall to #8...


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But its rooted in fact and speculation

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance reminds me of mahomes but when someone becomes a star they always look for the next mahomes but there is only one so I got lance as a bust I love darnold and will sacrifice 3 years to see if he can live up to the hype . At right now it’s like we drafted a top 5 qb in darnold he’s basically a rookie . We need Sewell if he’s there slater is overrated. Take best player it would be a land slide if pitts falls but that’s great but how does one pan out taking a tight end early big tisk risk look at oj Howard .idk who I want Idk for the first time who we get but I love surprises and who ever we get I’ll be happy and excited for all the summer posts of him in training camp .

I can’t wait keep pounding it’s going to be a great show come draft day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:
Trey Lance will go #4 overall regardless of what team owns the pick. Falcons, Broncos, WFT, or Patriots.

 

45 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

 

 

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

I like lance.  I think he will be there at 8.  However he is a long long way from being a nfl starter.  That's not really debatable.  I also think rhule and Co either didn't like what they saw or didn't want a huge project at pick 8.  Maybe both.   

 

From what I heard and read this past week it sounds like fields is going to be dropping.  Lots of noise about his throwing motion and slow going through progressions.   Listen to Chris simms break him down on the ringer podcast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

That wasn't opening day of offseason training either.  Again, they were there for the first one, that should be enough.  Not everyone had a second Pro Day, actually, nearly all prospects don't.

If they were interested they would have used that opportunity.  Don't kid yourself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...