Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pretty comprehensive Analysis about Panthers draft.


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

He was doing so good until He stated this.... 

98F51A8E-8F42-4BEC-84F9-5CA99DADF386.jpeg

He admitted that he did not do due diligence here.  He needs to slow down, do his homework, and refrain from stereotyping.  Loved his enthusiasm, but he was slurring over details---had too much to say.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Yeah and said terrace was just a very good athlete in his cons?

terrace had a 9.94 RAS score. 15th out of 2480 wrs since 1987 lol. He’s an elite athlete. Someone that big running a 4.38 40 is insane.

And if you mention a player dropping due to medicals, explain them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He admitted that he did not do due diligence here.  He needs to slow down, do his homework, and refrain from stereotyping.  Loved his enthusiasm, but he was slurring over details---had too much to say.

The best advice I could give him is to not wear an FSU t-shirt in his videos. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I will say that we do need to temper the athletic ability of this class since all the numbers are pro day numbers and not combine numbers. I can’t remember who posted it in one of the draft threads but there were a bunch of 9.9+ athletes all over the draft list of players not drafted day 1 and maybe day 2. Well that would mean that there were a dozen+ guys in day 3 that are top 40 or so athletes over the past 35 years. That’s too many amazing athletes in one draft and coincidentally the only draft without a combine.

They are likely still very good athletes but not top of all time.

Yep. Pro Day times are often much better than Combine times. Sometimes suspiciously so. Remember when Funchess ran 4.7 at the Combine then magically ran sub-4.5 at his Pro Day? Sure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sounds like liquor logic to me. Interesting_Professional_Alcoholic-Reddit-qtqp9v5xauw81-fallback+dash-audio_0_131639.mp4
    • I have also said I think a young Jake Delhomme would be a good pairing for Canales and what he wants to do.  QB has a lot to do with how I think Canales will do.  I don’t think he is in a place where he needs a QB that doesn’t fit what he does.  That’s more problems for a guy who doesn’t need them.   I have said I got no issue with Canales Got none with Bryce if we were to build a Bryce O around him starting last year with a scheme that fit him  I don’t like the marriage of of Canales O and Bryce. Too similar to last year where the QB and O don’t fit in my eyes   
    • Both would be nice to get but Zach will be long gone and Castle doesn’t want to be here. Personally I have moved to Buzelis.  Once he bulks up and polishes his game he has great upside.  He shot bad in the G League last year but that wasn’t reflective of how he shot in high school.  He is 19 and extremely skilled.  Very good athlete as well.  Do want. I think Ron Holland is another guy with crazy upside.  His defensive game is awesome.  Would like him too
×
×
  • Create New...