Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IF we hadn’t beaten Washington


mcsmoak
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually, in the last weeks before the draft, Verge repeatedly said we wouldn't take a quarterback.

Likewise, Jeremy Fowler reported that despite the Panthers putting out their willingness to take a quarterback, most of the other teams in the league weren't buying it.

It was a smokescreen, and one that apparently worked more effectively on fans and some analysts than it did on other teams.

Actually, Verge has confirmed post draft the Fields talk was real and there were people inside the org that wanted Fields.   The Horn side won the decision on the 8th pick.  

...as have other insiders and reporters.  


and it’s a safe bet the Seattle GM was a strong Horn guy.  And he is the most important vote. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We actually know just the opposite from both Person and Gantt.

Person was asked this in his Q&A:

Do you think the Fields talk was to bait other teams to trade up? Same with holding off on Darnold's option until after the draft?

His answer:

Yes and yes. Though Tepper's affinity for Fields was real.

if that's not enough, throw in this from Gantt's article detailing what took place in the war room...

Then the Bengals took LSU wide receiver Ja'Marr Chase in the fifth spot, followed by the Dolphins taking Alabama wide receiver Jaylen Waddle with the sixth pick, and there was a chorus of "yes," from the draft room.

With only one team between them and their turn, the Panthers were this close to having their choice of either Penei Sewell (the top left tackle on their board, at a position they could use) or Jaycee Horn (the top cornerback on their board, at a position they could use). Quarterback Justin Fields being available provided bait if someone wanted to make a move.

So no, it wasn't "debated until the end". By the time the pick was up, that debate was long over.

also when the "reports" came out that we were talking to 5 teams if I remember correctly about trading down, that told me we weren't interested in Fields.   It was pretty clear we were hoping someone would trade up in front of us for Fields, which would greatly increase our chance for Sewell.

There was a very good chance Trevor, Wilson, and Lance ware going top 3.  Pitts to Atlanta, and not crazy to think Bengals would take Chase and Miami go Waddle.  That leaves Detroit.  We were probably hoping someone would trade with Detroit to grab Fields.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

Actually, Verge has confirmed post draft the Fields talk was real and there were people inside the org that wanted Fields.   The Horn side won the decision on the 8th pick.  

...as have other insiders and reporters.  

and it’s a safe bet the Seattle GM was a strong Horn guy.  And he is the most important vote. 

From the third post in this thread, regarding who the Panthers would have taken if they had been at number three...

2 hours ago, Verge said:

1. Pitts 
2. Sewell 
3. Chase 
4. Horn

And from just a few posts later, specifically to you...

2 hours ago, Verge said:

I don't think they had any intention of drafting a QB in this class unless it was Lawrence as more stuff comes out.

Not sure what in your head is rearranging that to say that they were still interested in Fields when it's actually saying just the opposite.

The talk that there were people in the building who liked Fields was certainly real.

The judgment that Scott Fitterer and Matt Rhule were not among those people is also obviously true.

When they went into the war room, their draft board was set, and they followed it.

There was no "debate till the end".

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Plenty of reports that the Fields talk/debate was real.  And yes, Fields being there did make our position more attractive to others if they wanted to our spot.  

Verge said the talk was real on Fields. So have local guys like Ellis and a lot of traditional NFL insiders (like MoveTheSticks and others) 

I lean there way over the picture a Panther employee is painting after the draft.  

Lol at you if you think Ellis knows anything.

Verge had mentioned names that were never ever in play at 8 this year. Just like she did last year with Simmons. 

Same goes for Daniel Jeremiah. Mocked us Surtain this year at 8 in his final mock. That tells you all you need to know about how connected these people are to the Panthers FO.

I will say this one last time. If Rhule thought Fields was a franchise QB he’d be a Carolina Panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

Actually, Verge has confirmed post draft the Fields talk was real and there were people inside the org that wanted Fields.   The Horn side won the decision on the 8th pick.  

...as have other insiders and reporters.  


and it’s a safe bet the Seattle GM was a strong Horn guy.  And he is the most important vote. 

 

I know there were some people in the building like Fields, but not the right people. Once Darnold became our QB we became committed to him, clearly. I also thought we would have taken Mac Jones at 8, which obviously was not the case. Fields was not in the conversation at 8, not really anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

 

Verge had mentioned names that were never ever in play at 8 this year. Just like she did last year with Simmons. 

I had said Derick Brown if he was there, but thought Simmons was the pick if not. Was that not the case? Genuinely curious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Verge said:

I had said Derick Brown if he was there, but thought Simmons was the pick if not. Was that not the case? Genuinely curious. 

It was Brown or trade back. Simmons wasn’t a trade back target either. I never heard his name come up once. 
 

I do wonder if that article about the elevator ride/Simmons being taken off a teams board was actually us

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

I know there were some people in the building like Fields, but not the right people. Once Darnold became our QB we became committed to him, clearly. I also thought we would have taken Mac Jones at 8, which obviously was not the case. Fields was not in the conversation at 8, not really anyway. 

I'm not convinced though that we really only liked Trevor as far as the QBs go.  Why would we inquire about moving to 3? 

I think there is a small chance we might have liked Lance, we just hid it very well.  At the very least I think we would have heavily considered Wilson if he was there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

I'm not convinced though that we really only liked Trevor as far as the QBs go.  Why would we inquire about moving to 3? 

I think there is a small chance we might have liked Lance, we just hid it very well.  At the very least I think we would have heavily considered Wilson if he was there.

 

Wasn't the moving to 3 inquiry before we got Sam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

Some people like exercise their brains and analyze what could have happened. Sometimes it helps to build intelligence for use in future scenarios.

Why do you cheer for a team that you do not participate in or have kids playing on? Do you root only for Thor in the Avengers movies? Lots of people like different things, it happens.

I know there's a whole cottage industry around the Draft, but I don't think you can sensibly analyse and predict what 32 Front Offices are going to do - especially when half of them are dysfunctional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Despite their differences, QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online +1-844-476-5438 also have plenty of overlap. Here’s a look at how these two QuickBooks accounting software options stack up. Essential core functions There are two versions of QuickBooks Desktop (Premier Plus and Enterprise) and four versions of QuickBooks Online (Simple Start, Essentials, Plus and Advanced).  All versions of QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 offer similar essential functions, including the following: Import and organize transactions from bank and credit card accounts (PayPal and Square integration on Online only) Invoice creation Estimate and quote creation Accept payment from an embedded invoice link (through QuickBooks Business Network on Online only) See the status of invoices in real time Categorize business expenses for tax purposes Create reports (more reports on Desktop Enterprise and most Online versions) Capture receipts via OCR with expense category matching Charge and track sales tax (sync with Amazon, eBay and Shopify on Online only via third party apps or via add-on for Desktop Enterprise) 1099 contractor management  Inventory management (more inventory features for Desktop Enterprise and Excel imports/marketplace syncs via third-party add for Online editions) Time tracking (sync with QuickBooks Time Elite via add-on for desktop versions) Both QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online +1-844-476-5438 are especially well regarded for the following capabilities: Tax compliance Cash flow and expense tracking Business budgeting Ability to accept online payments General reporting features Multiple tiers Both QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 Online offer multiple service tiers that cater to different business needs, such as the number of employees who need to access the software. We’ll go into more detail on this later. QuickBooks Desktop vs. Online: The differences Here are some of the key differences between QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online. Features The main areas of difference between QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online lie in the accounting software features offered. The online version has several useful components that QuickBooks Desktop doesn’t. Here are some of the features exclusive to QuickBooks Online: Attach documents, images, signatures and more to individual transactions from both mobile and desktop devices Audit logging for tracking actions and changes over time Automatic nightly synchronization of bank transactions Auto-add banking rules Customize banking rules based on dollar value, percentage, class and location Journal entries with multiple accounts receivable and accounts payable (AR/AP) lines Turn management reports into presentations Scheduling and sending of future transactions with delayed credits and charges Support for multiple budgets during a fiscal year Transaction scheduling and dispatch automation Unlimited time tracking and reports-only users Conversely, many classic QuickBooks Desktop tools can’t be found in the online version. These Desktop-only tools fit neatly into five categories. Accounting: Ability to back up, restore and condense data and company files Correct unapplied credits and payments QuickBooks Statement Writer (add-on package for GAAP compliance) Client data reviewing Ability to post to extra AR/AP accounts Undeposited fund management Correction of sales taxes Create accounts for a specific time period Reporting: Industry-specific reporting options Header and footer customization on reports Support for multiple vendor ship-to addresses Business planners, balance sheets and forecasting by class Data entry: Batch invoices, transactions and timesheets Rate-level billing Automated Clearing House payments to vendors Inventory: Ability to build manufacturing features and assemblies Inventory reordering Partial receipt against purchase orders Value inventory using the average cost Management of sales orders and invoice tracking, unit measures and availability to promise Job costing: Ability to charge orders and change/markup estimate columns Payroll and labor cost calculation Reports for job costing estimates and actual amounts If you’re a QuickBooks Online user who wants these Desktop features, many third-party apps offer them for an extra charge.  Hosting QuickBooks Desktop is hosted locally, while QuickBooks Online is hosted in the cloud.  This means that QuickBooks Desktop users are limited to one hosting provider — the computer on which the software is installed — or a handful of licensed computers. QuickBooks Online can be accessed from any internet-connected device, including a mobile device with the QuickBooks app installed, after you enter a valid username and password. Because QuickBooks Online is cloud-based, it is a great option for those who need QuickBooks access while not in the office. QuickBooks Desktop is often limited to the number of installations included in your chosen service tier, so you may not be able to access the service if you can’t access the specific device with the software installed. One-time vs. monthly purchases Before the launch of QuickBooks Desktop 2022, the QuickBook products were available as a one-time purchase. Now, Premier Plus and Enterprise packages are available on a subscription-basis only. QuickBooks Online, on the other hand, is a monthly subscription. How much you’ll pay for each service depends on the service tier you buy. QuickBooks Desktop vs. Online: Service tiers and pricing You can choose from two QuickBooks Desktop tiers and five QuickBooks Online tiers.  QuickBooks Desktop service tiers and pricing QuickBooks Desktop will be discontinued on May 31, 2023. After that date, you won’t be able to access QuickBooks add-on services like Online Banking, Online Backup, Live Support and QuickBooks Desktop Payroll Services from any version of the desktop software.  
    • Vitamin Dee ME Gummies South Africa || https://supplementcarts.com/vitamin-dee-gummies-south-africa-official/ Vitamin Dee ME Gummies South Africa Inside this space of typical fixes, Vitamin Dee ME Gummies emerge as a shimmering signal, promising to lift your prosperity as well as your point of view. In this careful overview, we jump significant into the space of CBD Chewy confections, examining what makes them extraordinary, and why they most certainly stand sufficiently apart to be seen of wellbeing searchers all over the planet.   Facebook:- https://www.facebook.com/Vitamin.DEE.ME.Gummies.South.Africa.Official/   Vitamin Dee ME Gummies Reviews are the critically made dietary enhancement embedded with the supportive ability of CBD, or cannabidiol. CBD is an ordinarily happening compound found in the hemp plant, famous for its capacity to offer a wide bunch of medical benefits. These great chewy confections go about as a splendid and supportive vehicle to carry CBD into your everyday prosperity plan. Deal is here, Snap for procurement!!!   More Relative Blogs https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-za-3.jimdosite.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-za-66660b.webflow.io/ https://sites.google.com/view/vitamin-dee-me--gummies-za/ https://vitamin-dee-gummies-south-africa-official.mystrikingly.com/ https://soundcloud.com/anreafrikson/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews https://winter-supplement.blogspot.com/2024/05/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa.html https://theworldwidenews24x7.blogspot.com/2024/05/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa.html https://medium.com/@vitamin-dee/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews-exposed-2024-price-d06f067d26f5 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-official-903ad610fe004c15b54b0c434503cd5a https://medium.com/@deborahfortuneo/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-costs-2024-fake-or-not-27378d2b72c0 https://medium.com/@virasmadel/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-safe-to-use-website-ingredients-6314fda10213 https://medium.com/@reginagome89/warning-vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-uses-see-ingredients-best-offers-c8182d8a2507 https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-official.hashnode.dev/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews-exposed-2024-price https://newswirebusiness.medium.com/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews-effective-results-worth-the-money-205e7572844c https://sharktank24x7.over-blog.com/2024/05/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews-truth-exposed-do-not-buy-until-reading-this.html https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafricaofficial.hashnode.dev/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-reviews-controversial-news-risky-complaints-revealed https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafricaza.bandcamp.com/track/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-most-popular-male-enhancement https://www.studocu.com/in/document/dr-akhilesh-das-gupta-institute-of-technology-management/english-a-language-and-literature-sl/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-official-offers-100-safe-with-great-results/95312958?origin=user-uploads https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafric7.godaddysites.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-1.jimdosite.com/ https://groups.google.com/g/mailingpostfixusers/c/-zvWiNKCHC0 https://sites.google.com/view/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-za4/ https://vitamin-dee-gummies-south-africa.mystrikingly.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-a-b25f48.webflow.io/ https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafricaofficial.company.site/ https://sites.google.com/view/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-a/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-review.jimdosite.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-rev.webflow.io/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-review.company.site/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-a.godaddysites.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa.mystrikingly.com/ https://sites.google.com/view/vitamin-dee-megummies-za/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-3.jimdosite.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-a-1dbe21.webflow.io/ https://vitamin-dee-gummies-southafrica.mystrikingly.com/ https://vitamin-dee-me-gummies-south-africa-4.jimdosite.com/ https://sites.google.com/view/vitamin-dee-me-gummies-za-/ https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafricaprice.company.site/ https://vitamindeemegummiessouthafric8.godaddysites.com/ https://www.ourboox.com/book-preview/1589548/
    • Losing Necas would be worse than a majority of Canes fans think.  When he's on he controls the puck with speed and gains zone entry so well, he is still young.  He should be considered part of our core.
×
×
  • Create New...