Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D.Watson are we still interested ?


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Depends on the asking price, but generally I'd say no. Aside from his legal issues, the cost for such a move would likely be ridiculous, especially not knowing when and if he can play any time soon. 

Plus I dont think the Texans would be willing to trade him to anyone right now because the offers would probably be similar to what we gave the jets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

The steep cost does not line up with his awful judgement as someone who should be meticulous with his decision making as the face of a major sports franchise.

What everyone seems to be overlooking is that the cost shouldn't be nearly as steep. He'll likely be somewhat of a bargain now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

He may pay to make this all go away legally but there will always be a dark cloud over him for the rest of his career and who knows how much backlash those of the MeToo movement will cause for whatever team that acquires him.

I am not certain that Tepper would want to deal with that type of "publicity" when he's trying to build the franchise up to something respectable.  

THIS. There is winning the short game, and then winning the LONG game. Tepper didn't invest billions bring in a guy like that. Dude would literally be poison! With that kind of attitude to sit out, and also all this other mess hanging over him I cant even understand why anyone here still clings to hope for him to be a Panther

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously doubt it.

Even if he settles what he has now, you're always gonna be wondering whether something else might come to light.

Plus I'm pretty sure we still have people working for the team who were hot on by Jerry Richardson. You bring in a guy accused of similar issues and make him the face of the franchise, what does that say to them?

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From all the moves we've made, it's clear we decided we're going to give Darnold a real shot. We gave up a 2022 2nd, passed over Fields and Mac Jones at 8 and picked up Darnold's 5th year option. If they decided after all that to go all in on Watson and his pending legal issues, then I really don't know what this team is doing. 

Honestly, given the choice to pick Fields with a single 1st round pick and pay him $20ish million over 4 years (or around $45 million over 5 years), or give up 3 1st round picks and pay nearly $150 million over the next 5 years for Watson, give me Fields all day. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seriously doubt it.

Even if he settles what he has now, you're always gonna be wondering whether something else might come to light.

Plus I'm pretty sure we still have people working for the team who were hot on by Jerry Richardson. You bring in a guy accused of similar issues and make him the face of the franchise, what does that say to them?

Not saying you're wrong, but after all this, it seems like if there was something more, it would've come up by now. 

The Jerry Richardson situation and Deshaun Watson situation may seem similar on the surface, but they are different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not saying you're wrong, but after all this, it seems like if there was something more, it would've come up by now. 

The Jerry Richardson situation and Deshaun Watson situation may seem similar on the surface, but they are different. 

We kept saying that same thing when the number of lawsuits were escalating too. And every time, the announcer kept saying "but wait there's more".

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

A settlement offer was made day-1.

That was one offer. Now you have boocoo women who have piled on. It's night and day with so many more layers and it's potentially problematic for both sides. 

Plus, it's not like I thought this up personally, I'm just giving you an opinion that I read from several sources (via sources from a legal perspective).

 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

We kept saying that same thing when the number of lawsuits were escalating too. And every time, the announcer kept saying "but wait there's more".

Many weeks ago now, Scot. I think the pertinent questions now have shifted to potential problems in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, top dawg said:

What everyone seems to be overlooking is that the cost shouldn't be nearly as steep. He'll likely be somewhat of a bargain now.

Well we still don't know what the league will do about all this or if this is actually the end of this public turmoil for Watson. From the Panthers perspective they seem set with Darnold so if Watson were to become an option again it would be many months from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, top dawg said:

What everyone seems to be overlooking is that the cost shouldn't be nearly as steep. He'll likely be somewhat of a bargain now.

He’s radioactive and Tepper will not risk the the team’s or his own professional reputation.  Chernobyl can be bought cheap, too.  Is that a bargain?

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...