Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Niners confirm the smokescreen


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

Would the 9ers admit it anything else?

This is just standard "say you always supported the guy you drafted" talk, regardless of the situation.

When you picked in the top three, it's a pretty safe bet that you actually did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2021 at 12:11 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Gotta give it to 'em, well played.

Honestly not sure what the point was, though. Once they were at #3, they had their pick.

and you, the useless fuging media, ate it up when we all knew better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CanePantherHornet said:

This is bullshit and they're just trying to save face. There is absolutely no logical reason for a smokescreen in their scenario. Jaguars were obviously taking Lawrence. Jets head coach just came from the 49ers so he had to have some sort of inkling what they were thinking. 

 

That's my opinion too. An attempt to save face where the attempt itself basically betrays that the rumors were right all along. There was zero reason for them to try to put up a smokescreen after making their deal.

All they really had to say here was either nothing at all (probably the best option) or say they made the deal for Lance but of course they were going to continue to do their due diligence on Mac Jones too. Why wouldn't they? You've already made the deal. Make damn sure you're taking the best QB available.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2021 at 12:43 PM, MHS831 said:

Let's take a look at the genius behind the concept of a smokescreen here:

1. Trevor---LOCKED IN

2. Wilson---LOCKED IN  Jets were not trading out unless it was for a team willing to pay for Wilson.

3.  OH, we better do some head bobbing and weaving here---maybe a juke step.  That is like trying to bluff with 4 aces.   If they played Jones to fool people, I hope Jones scalds their asses when they play.

So maybe they wanted teams to invest time into bringing in Lance etc. after they supposedly took Jones.  Who? The Falcons?  The Bengals and Dolphins were set at QB---Philly? Detroit?  Denver? 

I do not understand the strategy.

 

Maybe they wanted to see if they could BS the Jets into picking Jones and they had Wilson above Lance on their board. Hard to imagine, BUT the jets are frikkin stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2021 at 12:43 PM, MHS831 said:

Let's take a look at the genius behind the concept of a smokescreen here:

1. Trevor---LOCKED IN

2. Wilson---LOCKED IN  Jets were not trading out unless it was for a team willing to pay for Wilson.

3.  OH, we better do some head bobbing and weaving here---maybe a juke step.  That is like trying to bluff with 4 aces.   If they played Jones to fool people, I hope Jones scalds their asses when they play.

So maybe they wanted teams to invest time into bringing in Lance etc. after they supposedly took Jones.  Who? The Falcons?  The Bengals and Dolphins were set at QB---Philly? Detroit?  Denver? 

I do not understand the strategy.

 

IMO there was no grand strategy.  The trade basically went down during Wilson's pro day and the 49ers were there.  IMO around that time they decided they had at least 3 QB options they would be perfectly happy with.  But if they stayed at 12 they wouldn't have a seat at the table.  They basically said that word for word after the trade.

For future reference the Mac Jones rumors came out WAY too soon after the trade.  They were basically instant.  Which basically means someone ran with a random story or Lynch literally hung up the phone to confirm the trade and then instantly dialed a media person to say "hey, we just made a trade and it was definitely for Mac Jones."  Either way it was BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wes21 said:

IMO there was no grand strategy.  The trade basically went down during Wilson's pro day and the 49ers were there.  IMO around that time they decided they had at least 3 QB options they would be perfectly happy with.  But if they stayed at 12 they wouldn't have a seat at the table.  They basically said that word for word after the trade.

For future reference the Mac Jones rumors came out WAY too soon after the trade.  They were basically instant.  Which basically means someone ran with a random story or Lynch literally hung up the phone to confirm the trade and then instantly dialed a media person to say "hey, we just made a trade and it was definitely for Mac Jones."  Either way it was BS.

I don't know how the story got out there, but it was definitely out there. Our friend Verge was one of the first to mention it here, with the source being another team's NFL scout.

It quickly became obvious that teams across the league bought into the idea, as did analysts. Mocks done around that time pretty much reflected the line of thought.

It wasn't until the last couple of weeks before the draft that rumors started floating around the pick might be Lance instead. But even then, most still seemed to think it was going to be Jones.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know how the story got out there, but it was definitely out there. Our friend Verge was one of the first to mention it here, with the source being another team's NFL scout.

It quickly became obvious that teams across the league bought into the idea, as did analysts. Mocks done around that time pretty much reflected the line of thought.

It wasn't until the last couple of weeks before the draft that rumors started floating around the pick might be Lance instead. But even then, most still seemed to think it was going to be Jones.

I definitely understand that the rumor grew legs.  But it was always BS, and alot of people knew it from the start and maintained it thru the entire process.  I think the timing of everything pretty much told the story here.  Lynch was on the road when the trade was announced, or so it appeared.  Noone "overheard" some secret conversation or discussion, which is how alot of rumors are painted.  "Sources close to the situation" could be anybody within an earshot of a conversation.  However with this one you either have to believe that Lynch picked up the phone to tell a media buddy that "oh yeah, I just made a move for Mac Jones" or when a media guy called Lynch immediately after the trade Lynch said "oh yeah, that move was definitely for Mac Jones."  And if either one of those scenario's was true...obviously they are blowing smoke up someone's butt because teams don't tend to do that.

In the end it was always BS and lots of people knew it from the start.  There was no benefit to them giving up their real "target" for that spot...so they either put out a BS name or allowed a BS name to float out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...