Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Confidential - A Look Into the Panthers Offseason


DeSim
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Makes sense.

When Rhule went to the board, he was talking about "guys they love" at 8. The others would fit as fallback options.

That would put quite a damper on the "Oooh!  That is Fields!  They're hiding something!" argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Panthers are "hiding" anything. We liked the option of trading a future 2nd and a couple of late rounders for Darnold better than drafting Fields at #8. Time will tell if that turns out to be smart or not. We'll see if the President of the Sam Darnold Fan Club follows him to his next stop if it doesn't work out here. We already know MrScot will convince himself that somehow this was still part of the Panthers' grand plan and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

@CRA, what are your thoughts on the tweet above?

Tucker looking pretty strong now that I see how his name is spelled.  That's got to be it.  I think the trade down list seems to make a lot of sense.  You know, that has to be factored in. 

I mean, the last one clearly starts with a F.   That's it.  The rest is a jumble.  Could be Farley.  Could be Fields.   I'm not sure you could really argue one over the other outside of just wishing to be right.    

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think the Panthers are "hiding" anything. We liked the option of trading a future 2nd and a couple of late rounders for Darnold better than drafting Fields at #8. Time will tell if that turns out to be smart or not. We'll see if the President of the Sam Darnold Fan Club follows him to his next stop if it doesn't work out here. We already know MrScot will convince himself that somehow this was still part of the Panthers' grand plan and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

Dude, you sound seriously butthurt over this stuff (yikes!)

I've already said if he doesn't work out, I think our next QB comes from the draft.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Tucker looking pretty strong now that I see how his name is spelled.  That's got to be it.  I think the trade down list seems to make a lot of sense.  You know, that has to be factored in. 

I mean, the last one clearly starts with a F.   That's it.  The rest is a jumble.  Could be Farley.  Could be Fields.   I'm not sure you could really argue one over the other outside of just wishing to be right. 

Would Fields be a reasonable possibility after a trade back though?

Given that the team thought that could at least potentially get a trade up offer for him, that doesn't seem logical.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Would Fields be a reasonable possibility after a trade back though?

Well, he went after our pick....and he went around the same area Tucker did.  More so than Farley. 

I mean, it's whatever your mind wants it to be. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, he went after our pick....and he went around the same area Tucker did.  More so than Farley. 

I mean, it whatever your mind wants it to be. 

Not really. Voth's tweet would seem to indicate it wasn't Fields.

Klein generally has good connections and info too.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

Tepper seems annoying to work for

He's honestly what I expected - a dorky numbers guy that made it big.

I've known plenty of dorky numbers guys throughout my career - I expect they'd act like him with money / power too.

He seems to let Rhule / Fitterer get on with it though. Just wants them to explain themselves, which is fair.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

He's honestly what I expected - a dorky numbers guy that made it big.

I've known plenty of dorky numbers guys throughout my career - I expect they'd act like him with money / power too.

He seems to let Rhule / Fitterer get on with it though. Just wants them to explain themselves, which is fair.

Yep. Likes to be kept informed of the process but doesn't inject himself into it, which is consistent with what we'd heard about him from Rhule and Gantt.

And yeah, I'm pretty relieved about that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not really. Voth's tweet would seem to indicate it wasn't Fields.

Klein generally has good connections and info too.

could of been Fiesta Taco Salad.  I don't know.  I know there is an F.  And it likely involved trading down in the first.  That still leaves Fields and Farley.   It's probably not a Fiesta Taco Salad from Taco Bell but maybe a team could have that sent to the war room as part of a deal.  Again, I told you I don't talk in absolutes about things I can't possibly be sure of.    Rhule could be that big of a Taco Bell fan.   

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...