Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, KatsAzz said:
Some NFL Scouts had a higher draft grade on Sam Darnold than those of Wilson and Fields. Wilson produced one great season against a "cupcake schedule," according to them. Fields had a couple of poor games in 2020, raising eyebrows.
 
Sam came out with a high grade and he has shown flashes he can be a really good quarterback. He hasn't had much around him.
 
Now you think about the change to a better Panthers team and that makes me feel he has shown enough to warrant the benefit of the doubt.

This. Wilson had 1 good season and shot up draft boards. He is more likely than not to bust, especially with the Jets. He had an easy schedule combined with Covid and the defenses sucking. 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SOJA said:

2 is basically what happened with Deshaun Watson

Tannehill was flat out better than Darnold was in NY, to go from the worst starter in the league to above average has rarely EVER happened in NFL history

Adam Gase was coach of Miami 2016,2017 & 2018 and the jets 2019 and 2020

Ryan Tannehill Stats | ESPN

Tannehill QBRs under Gase were: 45.6, 48.6 and 33.2 for an average of  42.5

Sam Darnold Stats | ESPN

Darold's QBRs under Gase were:  45.6 and 40.1 for an  average of 42.9

This surprised me...but under Gase,   Darnold's QBR was higher than Tannehill's.

Tannehill's QBR went from 33.2 to 64.2 after he left Gase.

Where will Darnolds 40.1 QBR go to?

 

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SOJA said:

Tannehill was flat out better than Darnold was in NY, to go from the worst starter in the league to above average has rarely EVER happened in NFL history

BTW, Tannehill was ranked 32nd by QBR in 2018, his last year under Gase. 

In 2019 after he left Gase, he was ranked 9th in the regular season, and 4th out 12 in the postseason.

2018 NFL Season Leaders Total QBR | ESPN

  

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SOJA said:

2 is basically what happened with Deshaun Watson

Tannehill was flat out better than Darnold was in NY, to go from the worst starter in the league to above average has rarely EVER happened in NFL history

In fact, in 2018, when Tannehill was under Gase, Darnold was under Bowles.

 Darnold, as a rookie, was ranked higher than  Tannehil that year.

2018 NFL Season Leaders Total QBR | ESPN

Sorry I should have put that all in one post.

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2021 at 1:46 AM, SBBlue said:

Adam Gase was coach of Miami 2016,2017 & 2018 and the jets 2019 and 2020

Ryan Tannehill Stats | ESPN

Tannehill QBRs under Gase were: 45.6, 48.6 and 33.2 for an average of  42.5

Sam Darnold Stats | ESPN

Darold's QBRs under Gase were:  45.6 and 40.1 for an  average of 42.9

This surprised me...but under Gase,   Darnold's QBR was higher than Tannehill's.

Tannehill's QBR went from 33.2 to 64.2 after he left Gase.

Where will Darnolds 40.1 QBR go to?

 

 

 

But that's not entirely true.

Adam Gase took over in Miami in 2016.

Tannehill had an okay season that year before getting hurt and missing all of the next season.

in 2018 when he came back he had a less good year, but it was still statistically better than Darnold in everything but QBR.

If we're going to be fair in the assessment being doled out here, it should be noted that Tannehill outplayed his previous year in his first year under Gase. He outplayed Darnold in 2016 as well. Obviously 201 7 doesn't matter since Tannehill didn't play. 2018 Tannehill played well compared to Darnold in every category but QB.

I have hopes for Darnold, but I at least think we should be talking about him honestly here.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

Tannehill played well compared to Darnold in every category but QB.

People want to switch stats when they don't like what they see.  Tannehill's last season in Miami had less than 2000 yards.  Which stat are you going to use to make him look good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

People want to switch stats when they don't like what they see.  Tannehill's last season in Miami had less than 2000 yards.  Which stat are you going to use to make him look good?

Tannehill had 140 less attempts than Darnold that season. He threw for .3 more yards per attempt, and had 6 less INTs and over 7% better completion percentage. Compare apples to apples.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

Tannehill had 140 less attempts than Darnold that season. He threw for .3 more yards per attempt, and had 6 less INTs and over 7% better completion percentage. Compare apples to apples.

Season QBR is apples to apples. 

You just don't like it cause it makes Tannehill look bad with the league worst 33.2 in 2018.    

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Season QBR is apples to apples. 

You just don't like it cause it makes Tannehill look bad with the league worst 33.2 in 2018.    

And if we go by Passer Rating? INTs? YPA? TDPA? TOPA? Completion %? 7-9 Dolphins vs 4-12 Jets?

The evidence is stacked against you. You're losing this argument.

A QB can have a passer rating of 158.3, which is perfect, and still have a 39.0 QBR.

This case is a perfect example of this. All the numbers tell you Tannehill had the better year by every possible measurement except for ESPN's convoluted QBR metric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...