Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

June 1st (trade and cut transactions) rumors


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Seeing rumors on Twitter that we are going to trade or release Robby Anderson for some strange reason.  I see no benefit in a move like that, unless they trade him for something somewhat valuable.  We have Robby and Moore and then a lot of unproven young guys....would be dumb to get rid of him now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Seeing rumors on Twitter that we are going to trade or release Robby Anderson for some strange reason.  I see no benefit in a move like that, unless they trade him for something somewhat valuable.  We have Robby and Moore and then a lot of unproven young guys....would be dumb to get rid of him now.

If the front office does that their going to lose a lot of goodwill they built up over the off season. How are we going to evaluate Sam Donald if we give him D.J Moore and a bunch of rookies.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Clicheking said:

If the front office does that their going to lose a lot of goodwill they built up over the off season. How are we going to evaluate Sam Donald if we give him D.J Moore and a bunch of rookies.

We do have Moore, he doesn't have Robby's speed tho.

Robby rocks and I would absolutely hate to see him leave.

I don't see them doing it for a pick next year....maybe for Oline help?

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, joemac said:

Seeing rumors on Twitter that we are going to trade or release Robby Anderson for some strange reason.  I see no benefit in a move like that, unless they trade him for something somewhat valuable.  We have Robby and Moore and then a lot of unproven young guys....would be dumb to get rid of him now.

If we release Robby I think it's because he's asked for it. If he's asked for it, I think I know why.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SBBlue said:

He's going to say Darnold....whatever.

What would Darnold have to do with that?  You would think Darnold would be a reason to KEEP Robby here, not get rid of him....hes the only guy with any sort of chemistry with Sam so far.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

What would Darnold have to do with that?  You would think Darnold would be a reason to KEEP Robby here, not get rid of him....hes the only guy with any sort of chemistry with Sam so far.

I agree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

What would Darnold have to do with that?  You would think Darnold would be a reason to KEEP Robby here, not get rid of him....hes the only guy with any sort of chemistry with Sam so far.

Why else would Robby want out? Why else would we want him out? He performed great relative to his contract last year.

To be clear, I don't buy the rumors. But IF they're true, that's the most likely reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...