Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: No movement in Panthers’ talks w/ Taylor Moton


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Does the business you work for allow you to set your own pay level?

...I'm looking for the Panthers to acquire a lot (not all!) of the hard-line "this is serious business" (both in the front office & on the field) no-holds-barred traits that have defined the Patriots for years now --- said traits are the baseline for their astounding success over the long-term.

The Patriots don't ever cave to player demands and rarely if ever hand out crappy contracts that are unfriendly to the team

Well Moton just got 43 million guaranteed 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like I said he would be signed long term. Hundreds of posts debating a 2nd and third tagging for nothing. Now what do we bitch about? He isn't playing left tackle so he is way overpaid? Or we can bitch about the terms or the guaranteed money? Personally I am going to enjoy we locked him up. After all it isn't my money, why should I care. NO has proven the cap can be manipulated very easily.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Hundreds of posts debating a 2nd and third tagging for nothing.

The debate was vigorous and had merit, clearly lost on you.

The no-spine crowd wanted to pay him Ramszyck money++ and that absolutely did not happen...

...why?

Because Tepper & Co. held the line and made it clear any and all tags would be exercised until the cows came home...

...the Moton camp got the message and caved. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

The debate was vigorous and had merit, clearly lost on you.

The no-spine crowd wanted to pay him Ramszyck money++ and that absolutely did not happen...

...why?

Because Tepper & Co. held the line and made it clear any and all tags would be exercised until the cows came home...

...the Moton camp got the message and caved. 

 

Another failed analysis on your part as usual.  As I and many others said he was going to be signed long term  and tagging a player multiple times wasn't even a thought. And you are wrong that Moton didn't get what he wanted. He was very willing to play under the tag and take his chances next year so the Psnthers wisely used that and made the contract an extension instead of replacing the franchise tag. Moton got his 13 million plus guaranteed this year and another 43 million for the contract for a total of almost 57 million fully guaranteed which is more for example than Ramszyck got which is only 43 million fully guaranteed. Some of the 60 million of his reported guaranteed money is only guaranteed for injury or if he is still playing.   The Panthers got a 5 year deal and fronted much of the guaranteed money so the dead cap in the last 2 years is manageable.  His contract makes him the 8th highest paid tackle in the league by average salary. He was ranked the 9th best tackle in football in 2020 so it was a fair contract. PFF thought it might be somewhat of an overpay. But it appears a win - win for both sides. No one caved and no one was threatening multiple tags but you.  

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-carolina-panthers-taylor-moton-franchise-tag-4-year-72m-deal-contract-extension

It is okay to admit you were wrong and let it go instead of going back and forth over a moot point now that he is signed longterm. But since you can't stop or admit you were wrong let me help. I won't be responding because now you are acting like a troll and we all know to not feed the trolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

His contract makes him the 8th highest paid tackle in the league by average salary.

You can be assured going into the negotiation his sights were set on being higher than "8th highest paid" -- and thank goodness the team conducted a rigorous negotiation and didn't "just pay the man" like you and so many others wanted them to do.

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

He was very willing to play under the tag and take his chances next year...

Clearly that's false.

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

But it appears a win - win for both sides.

Agree.

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

No one caved and no one was threatening multiple tags but you. 

Disagree.

Moton's camp absolutely caved and I am certain the team made it clear they'd keep on tagging him if he didn't agree to terms...

...now I can't prove that, just as you can't prove they didn't...

...res ipsa loquitur.

PS...letting Moton's camp know the team will use the tags available to them isn't a "threat" --- it's simply the polite thing to do so Moton & Co. can evaluate and negotiate accordingly --- clearly the triple-tag wasn't appealing to Moton & Co. so they took the offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...