Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the NFC South LBs: Where does Panthers' Shaq Thompson fit in?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wonder if part of Shaq's problem last year was playing next to Whitehead.  I can't imagine Whitehead gave anyone any feeling that they could safely assume the middle was taken care of.

I doubt he will ever live up to the future years of his contract, especially with the guaranteed money factored in.  My hope is he plays well enough to lessen that concern and make it worth pushing some of that out. 

If he can make it just expensive and not Hurney-esque, that will be about as good as anybody could hope for.  He didn't negotiate with himself on that deal, and it's not his fault our GM reacted to Luke's retirement by thinking if he paid Shaq like he was elite, he would become elite. 

Then add the "oh by the way, do it playing next to a void in the middle." 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Wow.  Maybe you should take your blinders off.

You are only hurting your case.  Not helping it.

If you are only going to call me out you aren't being consistent so we don't need to derail this any further. Good talk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I would have lost money betting he had more career INT's. 

Lol, In one game Luke had two of 'em in about a 5 minute span iirc (vs Romo). Then again, Luke isn't the guy you want to compare against.

Shaq isn't a bad player either he's actually slightly above average but keeping in mimd his draft spot and current contract, I am and have been expecting more. 

Stats dont always show the full impact a player can make on the field but five pass breakups, one interception 5 years ago seasons, 0 sacks last season ...70+ completion rate when targeted...damn near Whitehead numbers. To his credit he did have two forced fumbles, 100+ tackles and prior to last season was halfway decent when he was called to blitz. I personally like him because he's athletic and physical. Maybe he's playing out of position. All that said, I still think Snow has something to work with. 

Hopefully the additions we've added this offseason will be to his benefit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

I’m not sure he’s the best linebacker on our team. 

Perryman is maybe the best FA signing this year, but he has the injury-prone label.......but come on Shaq is the no question best LB here given Perryman may miss a few games. No chance Carter is better, tho you could be thinking CHinn is still a LB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Perryman is maybe the best FA signing this year, but he has the injury-prone label.......but come on Shaq is the no question best LB here given Perryman may miss a few games. No chance Carter is better, tho you could be thinking CHinn is still a LB. 

if shaq is our best we are still in a world of hurt at LB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2021 at 1:09 PM, Sgt Schultz said:

I wonder if part of Shaq's problem last year was playing next to Whitehead.  I can't imagine Whitehead gave anyone any feeling that they could safely assume the middle was taken care of.

I doubt he will ever live up to the future years of his contract, especially with the guaranteed money factored in.  My hope is he plays well enough to lessen that concern and make it worth pushing some of that out. 

If he can make it just expensive and not Hurney-esque, that will be about as good as anybody could hope for.  He didn't negotiate with himself on that deal, and it's not his fault our GM reacted to Luke's retirement by thinking if he paid Shaq like he was elite, he would become elite. 

Then add the "oh by the way, do it playing next to a void in the middle." 

Shaq was bad playing beside Luke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When they measure velocity they base it on an average of 3 throws, I think, could be 5. Each qb decides how he throws it. It's not taken from passes in a game. So basing on an "eye test" takes out bias. It's measured by a radar gun in a controlled environment. 
    • I think the long term is when this stuff pays off. You have to set it all up and get all the big dogs on the same page.  So if you have the right guy set it up, assigning all the values, you are ahead of the game and he seems to be the top guy. Figures Tepper would be attracted to having the Top analytics guy. Okay with me I guess. If they get to the point where I am mad they didn’t kick or go for it, it means they are doing okay. Cause I haven’t thought that mattered much for several years. 
    • Velocity MPH. Okay, that’s a number in isolation. what if CJ has a nice 85% effort motion that does what he is looking for? And Young has to step into things to get even 2 mph behind him?  I don’t KNOW that about either it is just an example of numbers don’t always tell all, but when I look at Young throw it reminds me of someone like Fran Tarkenton. A throwback non athletic weak armed scrambler for those of you who don’t remember. Had a great career in the old smaller slower but much meaner NFL. Would not today, IMO.  I think the arm strength questions, are plenty fair. And the eyeball test, it does mean something. Who would take Bryce Young over CJ Stroud or Richardson based on his arm? It is obvious to the naked eye where they stack up.
×
×
  • Create New...