Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is "My Life Dont Matter" actually Chuck?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

In his case, most likely. 

I mean, there is likely not a real way to determine what he actually believes. He is just here to create mayhem and entertain himself, like any troll is really. 

I wouldn't be shocked by just about anything he said. 

It's frequently up for debate whether somebody is just trolling or they're legitimately that stupid.

Given the Chuck all too often winds up descending into furious rants that get him banned, I'm inclined to believe he probably really is that dumb.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's frequently up for debate whether somebody is just trolling or they're legitimately that stupid.

Given the Chuck all too often winds up descending into furious rants that get him banned, I'm inclined to believe he probably really is that dumb.

I am not sure there is a more clear example of a troll than Chuck. He may be somewhat unsophisticated in his tactics to avoid detection but he appears to be pretty clearly trolling. Now, are his actual opinions and believes somewhat mixed into the bunch? Undoubtedly, but he is VERY clearly trolling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not sure there is a more clear example of a troll than Chuck. He may be somewhat unsophisticated in his tactics to avoid detection but he appears to be pretty clearly trolling. Now, are his actual opinions and believes somewhat mixed into the bunch? Undoubtedly, but he is VERY clearly trolling. 

Even accepting that premise, it doesn't really preclude him from being genuinely stupid, though.

Hell, putting that much effort into annoying people doesn't exactly speak of having an especially good life offline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Even accepting that premise, it doesn't really preclude him from being genuinely stupid, though.

Hell, putting that much effort into annoying people doesn't exactly speak of having an especially good life offline.

I don't presume to know anything about him other than what he does on here. 

The fact that he is getting under your skin pretty much makes him successful at what he is doing. It's really just best to either ignore him or not take anything he says seriously. Once you know he is trolling, it's extremely simple to deal with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't presume to know anything about him other than what he does on here. 

The fact that he is getting under your skin pretty much makes him successful at what he is doing. It's really just best to either ignore him or not take anything he says seriously. Once you know he is trolling, it's extremely simple to deal with. 

Not under my skin. I just have a tendency to call out stupid when I see it.

Mods probably wish I did less of that, but hey 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2021 at 2:41 PM, saX man said:

So folks, lookng at the ignore list:

Carolina Chuck

Forty-eight

over the legal limit

Carolina Chuck2

Carolina Chuck3

Footballlivesmatter

Carolina-chucky

Trainwreck

Pissed-off-Carolina Chuck

Humbled-Carolina-Chuck

--

Which ones are missing?

A couple mods on here come off as pretty douchey, can new ones be elected based of this new ranking system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Whippleman is the first, and only, male to have won the Women's Championship in WWF/WWE history.

Would be cool to hear someone say "Imma Mr. Scot guy"

I guess Andy Kaufman was never official.

2 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Chuck would be Shockmaster

Ouch! 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...